Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21427759›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2011

Variable set enrichment analysis in genome-wide association studies.

Wei Yang, Lisa de las Fuentes, Victor G Dávila-Román, C Charles Gu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Strategies for Pathway Analysis Using GWAS and WGS Data.Current protocols in human genetics · 2019
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Pathway-based analysis tools for complex diseases: a review.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2014
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wei YangDivision of Biostatistics, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Lisa de las Fuentes
Victor G Dávila-Román
C Charles Gu

Funding

Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesKL2TR000450 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$8.8M
GENETIC DETERMINANTS OF THE LVH PHENOTYPER01HL071782 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DAVILA-ROMAN, VICTOR G., GU, C CHARLES · 2003 to 2010
$4.7M
VARIABLE SELECTION IN GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDIES OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASESR01HL091028 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GU, C CHARLES · 2008 to 2010
$913k
MYOCARDIAL FA METABOLISM GENE-GENE INTERACTIONS IN HYPERTENSIVE HEART DISEASER21HL094668 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DE LAS FUENTES, LISA · 2009 to 2010
$418k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000450NHLBI NIH HHS HL071782NHLBI NIH HHS HL091028NHLBI NIH HHS L30 HL074749NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL071782NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL091028NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL094668
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complex diseases such as hypertension are inherently multifactorial and involve many factors of mild-to-minute effect sizes. A genome-wide association study (GWAS) typically tests hundreds of thousands of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), and offers opportunity to evaluate aggregated effects of many genetic variants with effects that are too small to detect individually. The gene-set-enrichment analysis (GSEA) is a pathway-based approach that tests for such aggregated effects of genes that are linked by biological functions. A key step in GSEA is the summary statistic (gene score) used to measure the overall relevance of a gene based on all SNPs tested in the gene. Existing GSEA methods use maximum statistics sensitive to gene size and linkage equilibrium. We propose the approach of variable set enrichment analysis (VSEA) and study new gene score methods that are less dependent on gene size. The new method treats groups of variables (SNPs or other variants) as base units for summarizing gene scores and relies less on gene definition itself. The power of VSEA is analyzed by simulation studies modeling various scenarios of complex multiloci interactions. Results show that the new gene scores generally performed better, some substantially so, than existing GSEA extension to GWAS. The new methods are implemented in an R package and when applied to a real GWAS data set demonstrated its practical utility in a GWAS setting.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyModels, GeneticPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAlgorithmsComputer SimulationHumans

Identifiers

PMID21427759
PMCPMC3172928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.