Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21427731›Full record

ArticleJournal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism2011

Response to 'comment on recent modeling studies of astrocyte-neuron metabolic interactions': much ado about nothing.

Silvia Mangia, Mauro DiNuzzo, Federico Giove, Anthony Carruthers, Ian A Simpson, Susan J Vannucci

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Computational Models for Calcium-Mediated Astrocyte Functions.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2018
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Silvia MangiaCenter for Magnetic Resonance Research, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA. mangia@umn.edu
Mauro DiNuzzo
Federico Giove
Anthony Carruthers
Ian A Simpson
Susan J Vannucci
Cornell University · USEnrico Fermi Center for Study and Research · ITFondazione Santa Lucia · ITPennsylvania State University · USResonance Research (United States) · USUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

ZOOMED FUNCT IMAGING IN HUMAN BRAIN AT 7T W/ SIMULT HIGH SPATIAL &TEMPORAL RESP41RR008079 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI VAN DE MOORTELE, PIERRE-FRANCOIS · 1993 to 2011
$16.3M
Neuroscience Cores For MR Studies of the BrainP30NS057091 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI UGURBIL, KAMIL · 2006 to 2011
$8.5M
SUGAR TRANSPORTER OLIGOMERIC STRUCTURE AND FUNCTIONR01DK044888 · NIDDK · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI CARRUTHERS, ANTHONY · 1992 to 2016
$4.2M
METABOLIC CONTROL OF SUGAR TRANSPORTR01DK036081 · NIDDK · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI CARRUTHERS, ANTHONY · 1986 to 2012
$3.4M
Diabetes & Stroke: Impaired wound healing in the brain?R01DK075130 · NIDDK · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI SIMPSON, IAN A · 2007 to 2011
$1.6M
Metabolic control of sugar transportR56DK036081 · NIDDK · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI CARRUTHERS, ANTHONY · 2007 to 2007
$266k
NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR008079NCRR NIH HHS P41RR08079NIDDK NIH HHS DK075130NIDDK NIH HHS DK 36081NIDDK NIH HHS DK 44888NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK036081NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK044888NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK075130NIDDK NIH HHS R56 DK036081NINDS NIH HHS P30 NS057091
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For many years, a tenet of cerebral metabolism held that glucose was the obligate energy substrate of the mammalian brain and that neuronal oxidative metabolism represented the majority of this glucose utilization. In 1994, Pellerin and Magistretti formulated the astrocyte-neuron lactate shuttle (ANLS) hypothesis, in which astrocytes, not neurons, metabolized glucose, with subsequent transport of the glycolytically derived lactate to fuel the energy needs of the neuron during neurotransmission. By considering the concentrations and kinetic characteristics of the nutrient transporter proteins, Simpson et al later supported the opposite view, in which lactate flows from neurons to astrocytes, thus leading to the neuron-astrocyte lactate shuttle (NALS). Most recently, a commentary was published in this journal attempting to discredit the NALS. This challenge has stimulated the present response in which we detail the inaccuracies of the commentary and further model several different possibilities. Although our simulations continue to support the predominance of neuronal glucose utilization during activation and neuronal to astrocytic lactate flow, the most important result is that, regardless of the direction of the flow, the overall contribution of lactate to cerebral glucose metabolism is found to be so small as to make this ongoing debate 'much ado about nothing'.

Indexed as

AstrocytesBrainModels, NeurologicalNeuronsAnimalsEnergy MetabolismGlucoseHumansLactic AcidGlucoseLactic Acid

Identifiers

PMID21427731
PMCPMC3130323
OpenAlexW2020125871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.