ReviewJournal of endocrinological investigation2011
The role of radiation therapy in the management of non-functioning pituitary adenomas.
Review in Journal of endocrinological investigation, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ischemic stroke after radiation therapy for pituitary adenomas: a systematic review.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2017Pooled it
- Boron-10 carriers and their applications in boron neutron capture therapy.Precision radiation oncology · 2026Review
- Article
- Radiolabeling molecular biomarkers of invasive pituitary adenomas: a narrative review.Pituitary · 2025Review
- Pituitary adenomas in elderly patients: clinical and surgical outcome analysis in a large series.Endocrine · 2019Article
- Article
- Cons: endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal pituitary surgery is not superior to microscopic transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenomas.Endocrine · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Surgical removal of non-functioning pituitary adenoma (NFPA) is the first-choice therapeutic option, but radical removal of the tumor cannot be accomplished in all patients. The best strategy to prevent regrowth of NFPA is still a matter of debate. Adjuvant radiotherapy is very effective in reducing recurrence rate after incomplete removal of NFPA, but concerns still exist about long-term toxicity of radiation. Different modalities have been developed to irradiate the pituitary region. One major distinction is between radiation techniques that deliver the total dose in multiple sessions using 3 fixed radiation beams and radiosurgical equipment that delivers the total dose to the target volume in a single treatment session. Progression-free survival of patients with NFPA treated by adjuvant radiotherapy is well above 90% at 5 yr in most studies and diminishes only slightly at 10 yr. Very few studies have a more prolonged follow-up. In comparison, the 5- and 10-yr estimated recurrence rate without adjuvant radiotherapy ranged from 15% to 51% and from 44% to 78%, respectively. Complications of radiation include rare but severe side-effects, such as secondary brain neoplasm, optic neuropathy, cerebrovascular accidents, and more frequent but less severe complications, such as pituitary deficiency. Optimal management of patients with residual or recurring NFPA after surgical debulking can be achieved through the judicious use of different treatment options, necessitating close cooperation between neurosurgeons, endocrinologists, and radiation oncologists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.