ArticleBMC family practice2011
Talking about depression: a qualitative study of barriers to managing depression in people with long term conditions in primary care.
Article in BMC family practice, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03068286 (Tailored Internet-delivered Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Depression and Anxiety in Patients With a Long-term Condition), which is not on this map. Cited by 73 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Tailored Internet-delivered Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Depression and Anxiety in Patients With a Long-term Condition (Chronic Pain, COPD and Diabetes).
Who cites it
73 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 158 citations in OpenAlex.
- Older Patients' Verbal Communication in Interactions With Primary Care Staff: A Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-Ethnography.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Pooled it
- Emotional distress, anxiety, and depression in South Asians with long-term conditions: a qualitative systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2022Pooled it
- Diagnostic accuracy of depression questionnaires in adult patients with diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2019Pooled it
- Multimorbidity and Patient Safety Incidents in Primary Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.PloS one · 2015Pooled it
- Collaborative care for patients with depression and diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC psychiatry · 2013Pooled it
- Is treatment of depression cost-effective in people with diabetes? A systematic review of the economic evidence.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2013Pooled it
- Patient experiences of depression and anxiety with chronic disease: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis.Ontario health technology assessment series · 2013Pooled it
- Case identification of depression in patients with chronic physical health problems: a diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis of 113 studies.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2011Pooled it
- Using a Person-Centred Approach to Adapt a Digital Therapy for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (COMPASS-IBD).Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Trial
- Effect of Computer-Assisted Cognitive Behavior Therapy vs Usual Care on Depression Among Adults in Primary Care: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2022Trial
- Trial
- Revealing hidden depression in older people: a qualitative study within a randomised controlled trial.BMC family practice · 2015Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- PCE-CfD and Long Covid: An NHS Service Evaluation on the Benefits of Using Person-Centred Experiential Counselling for Depression With People With Long Covid.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
- Case-finding for depression in primary care (CAIRO): a multicentre, cross-sectional study in England.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Perceived barriers and facilitators to managing psychological distress in COPD: The perspectives of patients and carers - a qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework (TDF).NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2025Article
- Immune links in comorbid depression and psoriasis: A narrative mini-review and perspective.Brain, behavior, & immunity - health · 2025Article
- Beyond glycemic control: a holistic perspective on psychosocial support in outpatient diabetes management.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
- Article
13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe risk of depression is increased in people with long term conditions (LTCs) and is associated with poorer patient outcomes for both the depressive illness and the LTC, but often remains undetected and poorly managed. The aim of this study was to identify and explore barriers to detecting and managing depression in primary care in people with two exemplar LTCs: diabetes and coronary heart disease (CHD).
methodsQualitative in-depth interviews were conducted with 19 healthcare professionals drawn predominately from primary care, along with 7 service users and 3 carers (n = 29). One focus group was then held with a set of 6 healthcare professionals and a set of 7 service users and 1 carer (n = 14). Interviews and the focus group were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed independently. The two data sets were then inspected for commonalities using a constant comparative method, leading to a final thematic framework used in this paper.
resultsBarriers to detecting and managing depression in people with LTCs in primary care exist: i) when practitioners in partnership with patients conceptualise depression as a common and understandable response to the losses associated with LTCs - depression in the presence of LTCs is normalised, militating against its recognition and treatment; ii) where highly performanced managed consultations under the terms of the Quality and Outcomes Framework encourage reductionist approaches to case-finding in people with CHD and diabetes, and iii) where there is uncertainty among practitioners about how to negotiate labels for depression in people with LTCs in ways that might facilitate shared understanding and future management.
conclusionDepression was often normalised in the presence of LTCs, obviating rather than facilitating further assessment and management. Furthermore, structural constraints imposed by the QOF encouraged reductionist approaches to case-finding for depression in consultations for CHD and diabetes. Future work might focus on how interventions that draw on the principles of the chronic care model, such as collaborative care, could support primary care practitioners to better recognise and manage depression in patients with LTCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.