ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2011
Pilot of a National Inpatient Medication Chart in Australia: improving prescribing safety and enabling prescribing training.
Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oral health, antimicrobial resistance and the need for interprofessional education.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Review
- Can a novel constructivist theory-informed feedback intervention reduce prescribing errors ? A pre-post study.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- Article
- The safety of computerised prescribing in hospitals.Australian prescriber · 2019Review
- The MOWER (middle of the week everyone gets a re-chart) pilot study: reducing in-hospital charting error with a multi-intervention.BMC health services research · 2019Article
- Medication-related issues associated with the documentation and administration of long-acting injectable antipsychotics.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2019Review
- Medication charts in residential aged-care facilities.Australian prescriber · 2017Review
- Use of the Delphi technique to determine safety features to be included in a neonatal and paediatric prescription chart.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2014Article
- Initiatives promoting seamless care in medication management: an international review of the grey literature.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2013Review
- Of snarks, boojums and national drug charts.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2013Article
- Article
- Of snarks, boojums and national drug charts.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2013Article
- Balanced prescribing - principles and challenges.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2012Review
- Rocket scientists need not apply.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2012Article
- Simple prescribing errors and allergy documentation in medical hospital admissions in Australia and New Zealand.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2012Article
- Variation in Gentamicin Dosing and Monitoring in Pediatric Units across New South Wales.Pediatric quality & safetyArticle
- Paediatric antimicrobial stewardship and safe prescribing: an assessment of medical staff knowledge and behaviour.Pharmacy practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
what is already known about this subjectPrescribing errors are common and are caused by multiple factors. Standard medication charts have been recommended by British and Australian Health services. A study of a standard medication chart in five hospitals in one state of Australia significantly reduced prescribing errors. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: A standard medication chart developed in one area can be adopted through a collaborative process and successfully implemented across a diverse country resulting in similar reductions in prescribing errors. Three of the four stages of the prescribing process (information gathering, decision making and communication of instructions) can be improved by the use of an improved standard medication chart. The introduction of a standard medication chart has enabled development of standard prescribing education programmes.
aimsTo establish whether a standard national inpatient medication chart (NIMC) could be implemented across a range of sites in Australia and reduce frequency of prescribing errors and improve the completion of adverse drug reaction (ADR) and warfarin documentation.
methodsA medication chart, which had previously been implemented in one state, was piloted in 22 public hospitals across Australia. Prospective before and after observational audits of prescribing errors were undertaken by trained nurse and pharmacist teams. The introduction of the chart was accompanied by local education of prescribers and presentation of baseline audit findings. RESULTS After the introduction of the NIMC, prescribing errors decreased by almost one-third, from 6383 errors in 15,557 orders, a median (range) of 3 (0-48) per patient to 4293 in 15,416 orders, 2 (0-45) per patient (Wilcoxon Rank Sum test, P < 0.001). The documentation of drugs causing previous ADRs increased significantly from 81.9% to 88.9% of drugs (χ(2) test, P < 0.001). The documentation of the indication for warfarin increased from 12.1 to 34.3% (χ(2) test, P= 0.001) and the documentation of target INR increased from 10.8 to 70.0% (χ(2) test, P < 0.001) after implementation of the chart.
conclusionsNational implementation of a standard medication chart is possible. Similar reduction in the rate of prescribing errors can be achieved in multiple sites across one country. The consequent benefits for patient care and training of staff could be significant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.