Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21424869›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of surgery2011

Laparoscopic splenectomy: standardized approach.

Liane S Feldman

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of surgery, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Single+1 Port Robotic Splenectomy Using the da Vinci SP System-Experience of a Single Centre.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Quest for the optimal technique of laparoscopic splenectomy - vessels first or hilar transection?Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2018
    Article
  12. Laparoscopic splenectomy for immune thrombocytopenia in patients with a very low platelet count.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Laparoscopic surgery: A qualified systematic review.World journal of methodology · 2015
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Robotic splenectomy: what is the real benefit?World journal of surgery · 2014
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Liane S FeldmanSection of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Division of General Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, 1650 Cedar Avenue, L9-412, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada. liane.feldman@mcgill.ca

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laparoscopic splenectomy was first reported in 1991-1992 by several groups. The impact and role of laparoscopy for splenectomy can be considered as significant as that for gallbladder disease, achalasia, esophageal reflux, and adrenal disease. In many centers, the laparoscopic approach is now routine for most cases of elective splenectomy. The laparoscopic approach is associated with reduced morbidity, especially pulmonary, wound, and infectious complications. This article reviews a standardized approach to laparoscopic and hand-assisted splenectomy and covers indications, operative strategy, and complications. Several special considerations, including massive splenomegaly, postsplenectomy thrombosis of the portosplenic venous system, and accessory spleens are also discussed.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyContraindicationsHumansSplenectomy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.