Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21424793›Full record

ArticlePrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2013

Subgroups analysis when treatment and moderators are time-varying.

Daniel Almirall, Daniel F McCaffrey, Rajeev Ramchand, Susan A Murphy

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Commentary on subgroup analysis in intervention research: opportunities for the public health approach to violence prevention.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2013
    Article
  9. Exploring connections between moderators and mediators: commentary on subgroup analyses in intervention research.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2013
    Article
  10. Introduction to the special issue: subgroup analysis in prevention and intervention research.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daniel AlmirallInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan, 426 Thompson Street, Suite 2204, Ann Arbor, MI 48104-2321, USA. dalmiral@umich.edu
Daniel F McCaffrey
Rajeev Ramchand
Susan A Murphy

Funding

THE REFINEMENT &APPLICATION OF MEDICAL DECISION MAKING IN PREVENTION SCIENCESP50DA010075 · NIDA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI LANZA, STEPHANIE T · 1996 to 2014
$24.5M
The Causal Effect of Community-Based Treatment for YouthsR01DA015697 · NIDA · RAND CORPORATION · PI GRIFFIN, BETH ANN · 2003 to 2018
$2.8M
Case-Mix Adjustment for Adolescent Treatment EvaluationsR01DA017507 · NIDA · RAND CORPORATION · PI MORRAL, ANDREW R · 2003 to 2011
$2.3M
Learning Adaptive Treatment Strategies in Mental HealthR01MH080015 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MURPHY, SUSAN A · 2007 to 2011
$2.2M
NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA010075NIDA NIH HHS P50-DA-010075NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA015697NIDA NIH HHS R01-DA-015697NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA017507NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH080015NIMH NIH HHS R01-MH-080015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prevention scientists are often interested in understanding characteristics of participants that are predictive of treatment effects because these characteristics can be used to inform the types of individuals who benefit more or less from treatment or prevention programs. Often, effect moderation questions are examined using subgroups analysis or, equivalently, using covariate × treatment interactions in the context of regression analysis. This article focuses on conceptualizing and examining causal effect moderation in longitudinal settings in which both treatment and the putative moderators are time-varying. Studying effect moderation in the time-varying setting helps identify which individuals will benefit more or less from additional treatment services on the basis of both individual characteristics and their evolving outcomes, symptoms, severity, and need. Examining effect moderation in these longitudinal settings, however, is difficult because moderators of future treatment may themselves be affected by prior treatment (for example, future moderators may be mediators of prior treatment). This article introduces moderated intermediate causal effects in the time-varying setting, describes how they are part of Robins' Structural Nested Mean Model, discusses two problems with using a traditional regression approach to estimate these effects, and describes a new approach (a two-stage regression estimator) to estimate these effects. The methodology is illustrated using longitudinal data to examine the time-varying effects of receiving community-based substance abuse treatment as a function of time-varying severity (or need).

Indexed as

Data Interpretation, StatisticalObserver VariationHumansModels, Theoretical

Identifiers

PMID21424793
PMCPMC3135740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.