Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21424678›Full record

ArticleMolecular neurobiology2011

Neuroanatomical profile of antimaniac effects of histone deacetylases inhibitors.

Camila O Arent, Samira S Valvassori, Gabriel R Fries, Laura Stertz, Camila L Ferreira, Jéssica Lopes-Borges, Edemilson Mariot, Roger B Varela, Felipe Ornell, Flávio Kapczinski and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular neurobiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. An update: epigenetic mechanisms underlying methamphetamine addiction.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Epigenetic Modifications of Major Depressive Disorder.International journal of molecular sciences · 2016
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Modeling mania in preclinical settings: A comprehensive review.Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry · 2016
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Camila O ArentLaboratory of Neurosciences and National Institute for Translational Medicine (INCT-TM), Postgraduate Program in Health Sciences, University of Southern Santa Catarina, Criciúma, SC, Brazil.
Samira S Valvassori
Gabriel R Fries
Laura Stertz
Camila L Ferreira
Jéssica Lopes-Borges
Edemilson Mariot
Roger B Varela
Felipe Ornell
Flávio Kapczinski
Monica L Andersen
João Quevedo
Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BRUniversidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense · BRUniversidade Federal de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An increasing number of studies have evaluated the potential therapeutic relevance of histone deacetylases (HDAC) inhibitors in mood disorder including bipolar disorder (BD). It has been suggested that the anterior limbic, which controls impulsivity and psychosis, is dysfunctional in BD. The present studies aims to evaluate the effects of microinjection of HDAC inhibitors in the ventricle, amygdala, striatum, prefrontal, and hippocampus on m-amphetamine-induced manic-like behavior in rats. Rats were given a single intracerebral (in the ventricle, amygdala, striatum, prefrontal, or hippocampus) injection of artificial cerebrospinal fluid, sodium butyrate (SB), or valproate (VPA) followed by an intraperitoneal injection of saline or m-AMPH 2 h before the open-field task. The activity of HDAC was evaluated in amygdala, striatum, prefrontal, and hippocampus of animals. The microinjection of SB and VPA in the ventricle, amygdala, striatum, and prefrontal, but not in hippocampus blocked the hyperactivity induced by m-AMPH. In addition, SB and VPA inhibited the HDAC activity; however, this effect varied depending on the experimental procedure and the brain structure evaluated. Our results suggest that the antimanic effects of SB and VPA, HDAC inhibitors, are related to the amygdala, striatum, and prefrontal, but not the hippocampus. More studies are needed to clarify the therapeutic effects of the HDAC inhibitor in BD and thereby develop new drugs.

Indexed as

AmygdalaAnimalsAntimanic AgentsButyratesCerebral VentriclesHippocampusHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsMaleMicroinjectionsNeostriatumNervous SystemPrefrontal CortexRatsRats, WistarValproic AcidAntimanic AgentsButyratesHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsValproic Acid

Identifiers

PMID21424678
OpenAlexW2156754935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.