Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21424593›Full record

ReviewSeminars in immunopathology2011

Regulatory T cells in lung transplantation--an emerging concept.

David C Neujahr, Christian P Larsen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in immunopathology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Donor-Specific Blood Transfusion in Lung Transplantation.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. [Predictors for the Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome in Lung Transplant Patient].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Small airways diseases, excluding asthma and COPD: an overview.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2013
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Lung transplantation.F1000prime reports · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

David C NeujahrEmory University Department of Medicine, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. dneujah@emory.edu
Christian P Larsen

Funding

Dissecting the Pathways Leading to Injury in Lung TransplantationK08AI079166 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI NEUJAHR, DAVID · 2009 to 2013
$644k
NIAID NIH HHS K08 AI079166
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung transplantation represents an option for patients with a variety of end-stage lung diseases. While surgical advances have led to improvements in short-term survival, long-term survival is limited by chronic rejection termed bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS). A growing body of work is devoted to determining why some patients develop BOS. One avenue of interest that has emerged recently is the role that regulatory T cells (Tregs) may have in protection from BOS. In this review, we will discuss the evidence that Tregs are relevant to outcomes following transplant. We will discuss the relevant animal models, in vitro assays, and human observational studies that support a role for Tregs. We will also explore the interplay between injurious T cells such as Th17 cells and Tregs as well as the effect that additional cell types and chemokines have on the balance between inflammation and regulation. Finally, we will review emerging therapies which may harness the ability of Tregs to lessen the effects of BOS.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkersCollagen Type VDisease Models, AnimalHumansLung TransplantationMicePneumoniaRatsT-Lymphocytes, RegulatoryBiomarkersCollagen Type V

Identifiers

PMID21424593
PMCPMC3395059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.