ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2011
RrS1-like sequences of water frogs from Central Europe and around the Aegean Sea: chromosomal organization, evolution, possible function.
Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unexpected variability of gametogenic pathways and interspecific chromosomal leakage in Pelophylax esculentus hybrids†.Biology of reproduction · 2026Article
- New insights into the molecular basis of gametogenesis in the hybridogenetic water frog Pelophylax esculentus.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Large tandem repeats of grass frog (Rana temporaria) in silico and in situ.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Karyotypes of water frogs from the Pelophylax esculentus complex: results of cross-species chromosomal painting.Chromosoma · 2023Article
- Genome elimination from the germline cells in diploid and triploid male water frogsFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Article
- Cytological maps of lampbrush chromosomes of European water frogs (Pelophylax esculentus complex) from the Eastern Ukraine.BMC genetics · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
RrS1-like sequences of water frogs (genus Pelophylax) display varied genomic organization, whereas the centromeric hybridization pattern reveals species-specific differences. Using fluorescent in situ hybridization, Pelophylax cf. bedriagae, Pelophylax kurtmuelleri, and Pelophylax ridibundus showed a hybridization signal at centromeres of chromosomes 1-5, but in P. kurtmuelleri the medium-small chromosome labeled was 10 rather than 8. Pelophylax cretensis had almost 16 of 26 centromeres labeled, as did Pelophylax lessonae from Poland when its chromosomes are hybridized with a homologous probe. When StuI-digested genomic DNA was hybridized with RrS1 probe, hybridization ladders for P. ridibundus from Poland have evenly spaced steps (about 100 bp) of uniform intensity from about 200 bp upward. Steps in hybridization ladders from circum-Aegean taxa vary in intensity: larger, odd-numbered steps are often fainter. A strong double band (800/900 bp) in Anatolian P. cf. bedriagae, emphasized by a weak 700 bp band, distinguishes them from P. kurtmuelleri from the Peloponnisos, in which the 900 bp band is almost absent. The ladder in P. cretensis lacks odd-numbered steps. A and B repeats, observed originally within the RrS1 satellite of P. ridibundus, occur also in the circum-Aegean frogs and in P. lessonae, Pelophylax epeiroticus, Pelophylax saharicus, and Pelophylax shqipericus. It is plausible that AB dimers or ABB trimers rather than A or B monomers correspond to functional/evolutionary units. The presence of regions similar to yeast CDEs and mammalian CENP-B boxes suggests a role for RrS1 sequences in centromere organization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.