Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21424347›Full record

ArticleHerz2011

Diabetic cardiomyopathy--fact or fiction?

B Maisch, P Alter, S Pankuweit

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Herz, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 162 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

B MaischKlinik für Innere Medizin-Kardiologie, UKGM GmbH und Philipps-Universität Marburg, Baldingerstr., 35043, Marburg, Deutschland. maisch@staff.uni-marburg.de
P Alter
S Pankuweit
Philipps University of Marburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epidemiologic as well as clinical studies confirm the close link between diabetes mellitus and heart failure. Diabetic cardiomyopathy (DCM) is still a poorly understood "entity", however, with several contributing pathogenetic factors which lead in different stages of diabetes to characteristic clinical phenotypes. Hyperglycemia with a shift from glucose metabolism to increased beta-oxidation and consecutive free fatty acid damage (lipotoxicity) to the myocardium, insulin resistance, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) activation, altered calcium homeostasis and structural changes from the natural collagen network to a stiffer matrix due to advanced glycation endproduct (AGE) formation, hypertrophy and fibrosis contribute to the respective clinical phenotypes of DCM. We propose the following classification of cardiomyopathy in diabetic patients: a) Diastolic heart failure with normal ejection fraction (HFNEF) in diabetic patients often associated with hypertrophy without relevant hypertension. Relevant coronary artery disease (CAD), valvular disease and uncontrolled hypertension are not present. This is referred to as stage 1 DCM. b) Systolic and diastolic heart failure with dilatation and reduced ejection (HFREF) in diabetic patients excluding relevant CAD, valvular disease and uncontrolled hypertension as stage 2 DCM. c) Systolic and/or diastolic heart failure in diabetic patients with small vessel disease (microvascular disease) and/or microbial infection and/or inflammation and/or hypertension but without CAD as stage 3 DCM. d) If heart failure may also be attributed to infarction or ischemia and remodeling in addition to stage 3 DCM the term should be heart failure in diabetes or stage 4 DCM. These clinical phenotypes of diabetic cardiomyopathy can be separated by biomarkers, non-invasive (echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging) and invasive imaging methods (levocardiography, coronary angiography) and further analysed by endomyocardial biopsy for concomitant viral infection. The role of specific diabetic drivers to the clinical phenotypes, to macro- and microangiopathy as well as accompanying risk factors or confounders, e.g. hypertension, autoimmune factors or inflammation with or without viral persistence, need to be identified in each individual patient separately. Thus hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance as well as lipotoxicity by free fatty acids (FFAs) are the factors responsible for diabetic cardiomyopathy. In stage 1 and 2 DCM diabetic cardiomyopathy is clearly a fact. However, precise determination of to what degree the various underlying pathogenetic processes are responsible for the overall heart failure phenotype remains a fiction.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based MedicineTerminology as TopicDiabetic CardiomyopathiesGermanyHumans

Identifiers

PMID21424347
OpenAlexW1513319197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.