ArticleSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2011
[Opioid therapy in patients with back pain. Claims data analysis for patient group characterization, influence on opioid therapy and work disability].
Article in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Health service utilization for low back pain in Germany between 2000 and 2020-a scoping review of claims data.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025Pooled it
- [Healthcare services research on pain in Germany. A survey].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study features an analysis of the analgesic therapy of patients with back pain focusing on opioid administration. Using claims data of a German statutory health insurance fund the analysis focuses on prescription patterns, the association between opioids and antiemetics as well as between opioid therapy and work disability. Based on typical diagnosis patterns three types of back pain could be identified: (other) specific back pain (46.0%), pain due to spinal disc diseases (23.5%) and non-specific back pain. The proportion of patients receiving continuous opioid therapy ranged between 24.3% and 48.8%. The prescription of antiemetics was associated with a higher chance of continuous opioid therapy (odds ratio [OR] 1.93; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.79-2.08). The chance of continuous opioid therapy was higher in pain patients with spinal disc diseases and patients with (other) specific back pain (OR 1.62 and 1.76, respectively; 95% CI 1.56-1.69 and 1.69-1.83, respectively). Continuous opioid therapy appears to increase the probability of a lower number of days off work due to disability (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0.76; 95% CI 0.70-0.84). Adequate prospective studies should test if the associations found can be confirmed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.