Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21424329›Full record

ArticleSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2011

[Specialized outpatient palliative care. The expectations of general practitioners].

N Schneider, P Engeser, M Behmann, F Kühne, B Wiese

Erratum issuedAbstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Analysis of radiation oncology integration within general practitioners' daily patient care: a cross-sectional survey in Germany.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Involvement of general practitioners in palliative cancer care: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2013
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

N SchneiderInstitut für Epidemiologie, Sozialmedizin und Gesundheitssystemforschung, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover. schneider.nils@mh-hannover.de
P Engeser
M Behmann
F Kühne
B Wiese

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim was to explore the expectations of general practitioners (GPs) towards specialized outpatient palliative care (SAPV) focused on older patients in the last phase of life.

methodsA standardized postal survey was carried out with 1,962 GPs in Lower Saxony with an analysis of physician and practice-related factors.

resultsThe response rate was 46% (n=897) and SAPV was known to 68% of the participants (n=599) of whom 48% (n=288) assumed that SAPV will improve the healthcare for older patients in the last phase of life. The GPs favored advice by and collaborative patient care with SAPV teams. Younger and female GPs, and GPs who had been practicing for a shorter period or working in a group practice showed greater interest in collaboration than other colleagues.

conclusionsThe perception of patients in specialized palliative care with its current focus on cancer patients is different from the perception in general practice with its focus on geriatric and multimorbid patients. This may be a reason for the skepticism showed in this study whether SAPV will actually improve healthcare in the community. However, with respect to the concept and framework SAPV has the potential to fulfill GPs expectations and should be focused on counseling and collaborative services. The knowledge about physician and practice-related factors shaping GPs attitudes towards SAPV can be helpful to further implement SAPV into practice.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorInterdisciplinary CommunicationAdultAgedAmbulatory CareAttitude of Health PersonnelData CollectionEducation, Medical, ContinuingFemaleGeneral PracticeGermanyHealth Services ResearchHumansMaleMedicineMiddle Aged

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.