Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21424287›Full record

ArticleDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2011

[Cost-effectiveness of hernia repair : IPOM versus open sublay mesh technique].

M Overhaus, C B Schaudienst, Y Nohl, T O Vilz, A Hirner, J Standop, A Türler, J C Kalff, N Schäfer

Abstract readComparative StudyEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M OverhausKlinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Thorax- und Gefässchirurgie, Universitätsklinik Bonn, Deutschland. marcus.overhaus@ukb.uni-bonn.de
C B Schaudienst
Y Nohl
T O Vilz
A Hirner
J Standop
A Türler
J C Kalff
N Schäfer
University Hospital Bonn · DEJohanniter-Krankenhaus Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In comparison to the conventional technique of incisional or umbilical hernia repair with sublay mesh augmentation, incisional hernias in obese patients can be surgically treated with minor surgical trauma by laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) repair. However, although shortened operation time, hospital stay and faster postoperative reconvalescence might be possible with IPOM repair, the economic calculation including mesh costs is significantly higher. In this study the two operation techniques were compared and the perioperative advantages and disadvantages of both methods were analyzed based on the German diagnosis-related groups (DRG) system.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCicatrixCost-Benefit AnalysisDiagnosis-Related GroupsFemaleGermanyHernia, AbdominalHernia, UmbilicalHumansLaparoscopyLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedNational Health Programs

Identifiers

PMID21424287
OpenAlexW183968794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.