Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21424153›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2012

Impact of analyzing fewer image frames per segment during offline volumetric radiofrequency-based intravascular ultrasound measurements of target lesions prior to percutaneous coronary interventions.

Jennifer Huisman, Marc Hartmann, Gary S Mintz, Gert K van Houwelingen, Martin G Stoel, Frits H A F de Man, Hans W Louwerenburg, Clemens von Birgelen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Cardiovascular imaging 2012 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jennifer HuismanDepartment of Cardiology, Thoraxcentrum Twente, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Haaksbergerstraat 55, 7513 ER Enschede, The Netherlands.
Marc Hartmann
Gary S Mintz
Gert K van Houwelingen
Martin G Stoel
Frits H A F de Man
Hans W Louwerenburg
Clemens von Birgelen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the present study, we evaluated the impact of a 50% reduction in number of image frames (every second frame) on the analysis time and variability of offline volumetric radiofrequency-based intravascular ultrasound (RF-IVUS) measurements in target lesions prior to percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Volumetric RF-IVUS data of vessel geometry and plaque composition are generally obtained by a semi-automated analysis process that includes time-consuming manual contour editing. A reduction in the number of frames used for volumetric analysis may speed up the analysis, but could increase measurement variability. We repeatedly performed offline volumetric analyses in RF-IVUS image sets of 20 mm-long coronary segments that contained 30 de novo lesions prior to PCI. A 50% reduction in frames decreased the analysis time significantly (from 57.5 ± 7.3 to 35.7 ± 3.7 min; P < 0.0001) while geometric and compositional RF-IVUS measurements did not differ significantly from measurements obtained from all frames. The variability between measurements on the reduced number of frames versus all frames was comparable to the intra-observer measurement variability. In target lesions prior to PCI, offline volumetric RF-IVUS analyses can be performed using a reduced number of image frames (every second frame). This reduces the time of analysis without substantially increasing measurement variability.

Indexed as

Angioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryImage Processing, Computer-AssistedUltrasonography, InterventionalAgedCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary VesselsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsObserver VariationPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID21424153
PMCPMC3326371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.