ArticleDer Internist2011
[Overweight. A valid predictor of cardiometabolic risk?].
Article in Der Internist, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Metabolic surgery or conservative measures as therapy of obese type 2 diabetics?]Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A commonly held notion directly correlates overweight and obesity with cardiometabolic risk. A number of studies have recently questioned this belief. The classic measure of obesity, the body mass index, appears less valid to properly indicate increased fat mass and, in particular, potentially harmful changes in fat depots. Moreover, depot- and age-specific alterations including increases in fat mass are physiologic throughout life and may not be associated with an increased risk for diabetes or cardiovascular complications. In contrast, they may rather entail multi-system adaptations that are protective, e. g. to cardiovascular and bone health, and represent an explanation for what has recently been called "benign obesity". Endocrine as well as thermogenic functions of fat cells appear to be critical for the underlying biology. In this article, we highlight recent epidemiologic and biologic insights arguing against the assumption of overweight as a simple measure of disease. Finally, using selected clinical cases we demonstrate the ill-informed nature of an "overweight-focused" approach and delineate a practical algorithm to identify overweight patients at cardiometabolic risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21424145What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.