Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21423721›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2011

Chiasmata promote monopolar attachment of sister chromatids and their co-segregation toward the proper pole during meiosis I.

Yukinobu Hirose, Ren Suzuki, Tatsunori Ohba, Yumi Hinohara, Hirotada Matsuhara, Masashi Yoshida, Yuta Itabashi, Hiroshi Murakami, Ayumu Yamamoto

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. A Homozygous Loss-of-Function Mutation inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Meiotic Chromosome Synapsis and XY-Body FormationFrontiers in endocrinology · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Low recombination rates in sexual species and sex-asex transitions.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Telomeric TERB1-TRF1 interaction is crucial for male meiosis.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Evolutionary mysteries in meiosis.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yukinobu HiroseThe Department of Chemistry, Shizuoka University, Shizuoka, Japan.
Ren Suzuki
Tatsunori Ohba
Yumi Hinohara
Hirotada Matsuhara
Masashi Yoshida
Yuta Itabashi
Hiroshi Murakami
Ayumu Yamamoto
Shizuoka University · JPNagoya City University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The chiasma is a structure that forms between a pair of homologous chromosomes by crossover recombination and physically links the homologous chromosomes during meiosis. Chiasmata are essential for the attachment of the homologous chromosomes to opposite spindle poles (bipolar attachment) and their subsequent segregation to the opposite poles during meiosis I. However, the overall function of chiasmata during meiosis is not fully understood. Here, we show that chiasmata also play a crucial role in the attachment of sister chromatids to the same spindle pole and in their co-segregation during meiosis I in fission yeast. Analysis of cells lacking chiasmata and the cohesin protector Sgo1 showed that loss of chiasmata causes frequent bipolar attachment of sister chromatids during anaphase. Furthermore, high time-resolution analysis of centromere dynamics in various types of chiasmate and achiasmate cells, including those lacking the DNA replication checkpoint factor Mrc1 or the meiotic centromere protein Moa1, showed the following three outcomes: (i) during the pre-anaphase stage, the bipolar attachment of sister chromatids occurs irrespective of chiasma formation; (ii) the chiasma contributes to the elimination of the pre-anaphase bipolar attachment; and (iii) when the bipolar attachment remains during anaphase, the chiasmata generate a bias toward the proper pole during poleward chromosome pulling that results in appropriate chromosome segregation. Based on these results, we propose that chiasmata play a pivotal role in the selection of proper attachments and provide a backup mechanism that promotes correct chromosome segregation when improper attachments remain during anaphase I.

Indexed as

AnaphaseCell Cycle ProteinsCentromereChromatidsChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneChromosome SegregationChromosomes, FungalDNA-Binding ProteinsGene DeletionMad2 ProteinsMeiosisMeiotic Recombination Protein SPO11Nuclear ProteinsSchizosaccharomycesSchizosaccharomyces pombe ProteinsSister Chromatid ExchangeCell Cycle ProteinsChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneDNA-Binding ProteinsMad2 Proteinsmad2 protein, S pombeMeiotic Recombination Protein SPO11Moa1 protein, S pombeMRC1 protein, S pombeNuclear Proteinsrec12 protein, S pombeSchizosaccharomyces pombe ProteinsSgo1 protein, S pombe

Identifiers

PMID21423721
PMCPMC3053323
OpenAlexW2076836192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.