Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21423646›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2011

BCG-mediated protection against Mycobacterium ulcerans infection in the mouse.

Paul J Converse, Deepak V Almeida, Eric L Nuermberger, Jacques H Grosset

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Many Hosts of Mycobacteria 9 (MHM9): A conference report.Tuberculosis (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2023
    Article
  4. Drug Efficacy Testing in the Mouse Footpad Model of Buruli Ulcer.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  5. Conditions for Handling and Optimal Storage of Mycolactone.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. In Vivo Imaging of BioluminescentThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paul J ConverseJohns Hopkins University Center for Tuberculosis Research, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. pconvers@jhsph.edu
Deepak V Almeida
Eric L Nuermberger
Jacques H Grosset
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Firing up new treatments against Mycobacterium ulcerans disease (Buruli ulcer)R01AI082612 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GROSSET, JACQUES H. · 2009 to 2013
$2.0M
NIAID NIH HHS R01-AI.082612
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVaccination with Mycobacterium bovis bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) is widely used to reduce the risk of childhood tuberculosis and has been reported to have efficacy against two other mycobacterial diseases, leprosy and Buruli ulcer caused by M. ulcerans (Mu). Studies in experimental models have also shown some efficacy against infection caused by Mu. In mice, most studies use the C57BL/6 strain that is known to develop good cell-mediated protective immunity. We hypothesized that there may be differences in vaccination efficacy between C57BL/6 and the less resistant BALB/c strain.

methodsWe evaluated BCG vaccine efficacy against challenge with ∼3×10(5)M. ulcerans in the right hind footpad using three strains: initially, the Australian type strain, designated Mu1617, then, a Malaysian strain, Mu1615, and a recent Ghanaian isolate, Mu1059. The latter two strains both produce mycolactone while the Australian strain has lost that capacity. CFU of both BCG and Mu and splenocyte cytokine production were determined at intervals after infection. Time to footpad swelling was assessed weekly. PRINCIPAL

findingsBCG injection induced visible scars in 95.5% of BALB/c mice but only 43.4% of C57BL/6 mice. BCG persisted at higher levels in spleens of BALB/c than C57BL/6 mice. Vaccination delayed swelling and reduced Mu CFU in BALB/c mice, regardless of challenge strain. However, vaccination was only protective against Mu1615 and Mu1617 in C57BL/6 mice. Possible correlates of the better protection of BALB/c mice included 1) the near universal development of BCG scars in these mice compared to less frequent and smaller scars observed in C57BL/6 mice and 2) the induction of sustained cytokine, e.g., IL17, production as detected in the spleens of BALB/c mice whereas cytokine production was significantly reduced, e.g., IL17, or transient, e.g., Ifnγ, in the spleens of C57BL/6 mice.

conclusionsThe efficacy of BCG against M. ulcerans, in particular, and possibly mycobacteria in general, may vary due to differences in both host and pathogen.

Indexed as

AnimalsBCG VaccineBuruli UlcerColony Count, MicrobialCytokinesFootLeukocytes, MononuclearMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, Inbred C57BLMycobacterium ulceransSpleenBCG VaccineCytokines

Identifiers

PMID21423646
PMCPMC3057947
OpenAlexW2015398968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.