Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21423527›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in synaptic neuroscience2010

Differential Regulation of Synaptic Vesicle Tethering and Docking by UNC-18 and TOM-1.

Elena O Gracheva, Ed B Maryon, Martine Berthelot-Grosjean, Janet E Richmond

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in synaptic neuroscience, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Genetic dissection of neuropeptide cell biology at high and low activity in a defined sensory neuron.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  10. The presynaptic machinery at the synapse of C. elegans.Invertebrate neuroscience : IN · 2018
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Dynamic Partitioning of Synaptic Vesicle Pools by the SNARE-Binding Protein Tomosyn.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Elena O GrachevaDepartment of Physiology, University of California at San Francisco , USA .
Ed B Maryon
Martine Berthelot-Grosjean
Janet E Richmond
University of Illinois Chicago · USCentre des Sciences du Goût et de l'Alimentation · FR

Funding

The role of tomosyn in synaptic transmission.R01MH073156 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI RICHMOND, JANET E · 2006 to 2010
$2.0M
UNC-18 function in C. elegans synaptic transmissionR01NS041477 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI RICHMOND, JANET E · 2002 to 2006
$1.2M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH073156NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS041477
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The assembly of SNARE complexes between syntaxin, SNAP-25 and synaptobrevin is required to prime synaptic vesicles for fusion. Since Munc18 and tomosyn compete for syntaxin interactions, the interplay between these proteins is predicted to be important in regulating synaptic transmission. We explored this possibility, by examining genetic interactions between C. elegans unc-18(Munc18), unc-64(syntaxin) and tom-1(tomosyn). We have previously demonstrated that unc-18 mutants have reduced synaptic transmission, whereas tom-1 mutants exhibit enhanced release. Here we show that the unc-18 mutant release defect is associated with loss of two morphologically distinct vesicle pools; those tethered within 25 nm of the plasma membrane and those docked with the plasma membrane. In contrast, priming defective unc-13 mutants accumulate tethered vesicles, while docked vesicles are greatly reduced, indicating tethering is UNC-18-dependent and occurs in the absence of priming. C. elegans unc-64 mutants phenocopy unc-18 mutants, losing both tethered and docked vesicles, whereas overexpression of open syntaxin preferentially increases vesicle docking, suggesting UNC-18/closed syntaxin interactions are responsible for vesicle tethering. Given the competition between vertebrate tomosyn and Munc18, for syntaxin binding, we hypothesized that C. elegans TOM-1 may inhibit both UNC-18-dependent vesicle targeting steps. Consistent with this hypothesis, tom-1 mutants exhibit enhanced UNC-18 plasma membrane localization and a concomitant increase in both tethered and docked synaptic vesicles. Furthermore, in tom-1;unc-18 double mutants the docked, primed vesicle pool is preferentially rescued relative to unc-18 single mutants. Together these data provide evidence for the differential regulation of two vesicle targeting steps by UNC-18 and TOM-1 through competitive interactions with syntaxin.

Indexed as

Caenorhabditis eleganshigh-pressure freeze electron microscopysynaptic transmissionsyntaxintomosynUNC-18vesicle dockingvesicle tethering

Identifiers

PMID21423527
PMCPMC3059690
OpenAlexW2116224488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.