Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21423210›Full record

ArticleOncogene2011

HGF-independent potentiation of EGFR action by c-Met.

A M Dulak, C T Gubish, L P Stabile, C Henry, J M Siegfried

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncogene, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. The MET Oncogene Network of Interacting Cell Surface Proteins.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. [Research Progresses in the Treatment of NSCLC with MET Gene Variants: A Riview].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Identifying novel SMYD3 interactors on the trail of cancer hallmarks.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Amivantamab for the treatment ofExpert review of anticancer therapy · 2022
    Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A M DulakDepartment of Pharmacology & Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
C T Gubish
L P Stabile
C Henry
J M Siegfried
University of Pittsburgh · USUPMC Hillman Cancer Center · US

Funding

Targeting the HGF/c-Met Pathway in Lung CancerR01CA079882 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI SIEGFRIED, JILL M · 1999 to 2013
$3.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA079882NCI NIH HHS R01 CA79882
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The c-Met receptor is a potential therapeutic target for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Signaling interactions between c-Met and the mutant epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) have been studied extensively, but signaling intermediates and biological consequences of lateral signaling to c-Met in EGFR wild-type tumors are minimally understood. Our observations indicate that delayed c-Met activation in NSCLC cell lines is initiated by wild-type EGFR, the receptor most often found in NSCLC tumors. EGFR ligands induce accumulation of activated c-Met, which begins at 8 h and continues for 48 h. This effect is accompanied by an increase in c-Met expression and phosphorylation of critical c-Met tyrosine residues without activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) or Akt. Gene transcription is required for delayed c-Met activation; however, phosphorylation of c-Met by EGFR occurs without production of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) or another secreted factor, supporting a ligand-independent mechanism. Lateral signaling is blocked by two selective c-Met tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), PF2341066 and SU11274, or with gefitinib, an EGFR TKI, suggesting kinase activity of both receptors is required for this effect. Prolonged c-Src phosphorylation is observed, and c-Src pathway is essential for EGFR to c-Met communication. Pretreatment with pan-Src family kinase inhibitors, PP2 and dasatinib, abolishes delayed c-Met phosphorylation. A c-Src dominant-negative construct reduces EGF-induced c-Met phosphorylation compared with control, further confirming a c-Src requirement. Inhibition of c-Met with PF2341066 and siRNA decreases EGF-induced phenotypes of invasion by ~86% and motility by ~81%, suggesting that a novel form of c-Met activation is utilized by EGFR to maximize these biological effects. Combined targeting of c-Met and EGFR leads to increased xenograft antitumor activity, demonstrating that inhibition of downstream and lateral signaling from the EGFR-c-Src-c-Met axis might be effective in treatment of NSCLC.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCell Line, TumorCSK Tyrosine-Protein KinaseEpidermal Growth FactorErbB ReceptorsHepatocyte Growth FactorHumansLung NeoplasmsPhosphorylationProtein-Tyrosine KinasesProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycSignal Transductionsrc-Family KinasesCSK protein, humanCSK Tyrosine-Protein KinaseEGFR protein, humanEpidermal Growth FactorErbB ReceptorsHepatocyte Growth FactorHGF protein, humanMYC protein, humanProtein-Tyrosine KinasesProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycsrc-Family Kinases

Identifiers

PMID21423210
PMCPMC3126872
OpenAlexW2011138678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.