Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21423003›Full record

ArticleCritical care medicine2011

Survey of pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in critically ill children.

Edward Vincent S Faustino, Sonya Patel, Ravi R Thiagarajan, Deborah J Cook, Veronika Northrup, Adrienne G Randolph

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Factors Associated With Continuous Low-Dose Heparin Infusion for Central Venous Catheter Patency in Critically Ill Children Worldwide.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2016
    Observational
  3. Article
  4. [Thromboprophylaxis in critically ill children in Spain and Portugal].Anales de pediatria (Barcelona, Spain : 2003) · 2015
    Observational
  5. Article
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 5 countries.

Edward Vincent S FaustinoDepartment of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. vince.faustino@yale.edu
Sonya Patel
Ravi R Thiagarajan
Deborah J Cook
Veronika Northrup
Adrienne G Randolph
Yale New Haven Hospital · US

Funding

YALE UNIVERSITY CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE AWARD PROGRAMUL1RR024139 · NCRR · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SHERWIN, ROBERT S · 2006 to 2011
$56.8M
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024139
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThere is lack of evidence to guide thromboprophylaxis in the pediatric intensive care unit. We aimed to assess current prescribing practice for pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in critically ill children.

settingPediatric intensive care units in the United States and Canada with at least ten beds.

designCross-sectional self-administered survey of pediatric intensivists using adolescent, child, and infant scenarios.

participantsPediatric intensive care unit clinical directors or section heads.

interventionsNone. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsPhysician leaders from 97 of 151 (64.2%) pediatric intensive care units or their designees responded to the survey. In mechanically ventilated children, 42.3% of the respondents would usually or always prescribe thromboprophylaxis for the adolescent but only 1.0% would prescribe it for the child and 1.1% for the infant. Considering all pediatric intensive care unit patients, 3.1%, 32.0%, and 44.2% of respondents would never prescribe thromboprophylaxis for the adolescent, child, and infant scenarios, respectively. These findings were significant (p < .001 for the adolescent vs. child and infant; p = .002 for child vs. infant). Other patient factors that increased the likelihood of prescribing prophylaxis to a critically ill child for all three scenarios were the presence of hypercoagulability, prior deep venous thrombosis, or a cavopulmonary anastomosis. Prophylaxis was less likely to be prescribed to patients with major bleeding or an anticipated invasive intervention. Low-molecular-weight heparin was the most commonly prescribed drug.

conclusionsIn these scenarios, physician leaders in pediatric intensive care units were more likely to prescribe thromboprophylaxis to adolescents compared with children or infants, but they prescribed it less often in adolescents than is recommended by evidence-based guidelines for adults. The heterogeneity in practice we documented underscores the need for rigorous randomized trials to determine the need for thromboprophylaxis in critically ill adolescents and children.

Indexed as

Practice Patterns, Physicians'AdolescentAnticoagulantsChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesHeparin, Low-Molecular-WeightHumansInfantIntensive Care Units, PediatricPulmonary EmbolismRespiration, ArtificialStatistics, NonparametricVenous ThromboembolismVenous ThrombosisAnticoagulantsHeparin, Low-Molecular-Weight

Identifiers

PMID21423003
PMCPMC3118917
OpenAlexW1977611331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.