Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21422389›Full record

ArticleCirculation2011

Stent thrombogenicity early in high-risk interventional settings is driven by stent design and deployment and protected by polymer-drug coatings.

Kumaran Kolandaivelu, Rajesh Swaminathan, William J Gibson, Vijaya B Kolachalama, Kim-Lien Nguyen-Ehrenreich, Virginia L Giddings, Leslie Coleman, Gee K Wong, Elazer R Edelman

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Circulation, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 253 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
253citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02785237 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Intra-patient Randomized Study With Polymer Free Drug Eluting Stent Versus Abluminal Biodegradable Polymer Drug Eluting Stent With Early OCT Follow up

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research InstituteRan2016 to 2019Enrolled70ConditionsCoronary Artery DiseaseArmsCoroflex® ISAR Drug-eluting stent, Ultimaster® Drug-eluting stent
NCT03026465 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Vessel Injury in Relation With Strut Thickness Assessed by OCT (VISTA): A Comparison of Vascular Injury Induced by a Polymer Free Sirolimus and Probucol Eluting Stent and a Biodegradable-polymer Biolimus-eluting Stent

TypeinterventionalSponsorFundacion Investigacion Interhospitalaria CardiovascularRan2017 to 2018Enrolled50ConditionsCoronary Artery DiseaseArmsPolymer-free stent, Biodegradable-polymer stent
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

253 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Abbreviated versus Standard Duration of DAPT after PCI: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2022
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Five-year outcomes of a drug-coated polymer-free biolimus-eluting stent versus an ultrathin-strut biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stent.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Trial
  12. Durable-polymer versus biodegradable-polymer drug-eluting stents in acute coronary syndromes: three-year outcomes of the HOST REDUCE POLYTECH RCT Trial.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Durable polymer versus biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing complex percutaneous coronary intervention: a post hoc analysis of the HOST-REDUCE-POLYTECH-ACS trial.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2022
    Trial
  15. Sirolimus-eluting stents with ultrathin struts versus everolimus-eluting stents for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: final three-year results of the TALENT trial.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2022
    Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Individual patient data analysis of the BIOFLOW study program comparing safety and efficacy of a bioresorbable polymer sirolimus eluting stent to a durable polymer everolimus eluting stent.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2021
    Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

193 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kumaran Kolandaivelu77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. kkolandaivelu@partners.org
Rajesh Swaminathan
William J Gibson
Vijaya B Kolachalama
Kim-Lien Nguyen-Ehrenreich
Virginia L Giddings
Leslie Coleman
Gee K Wong
Elazer R Edelman
Norwegian Womens Public Health Association · NOAVEO Oncology (United States) · US

Funding

Vascular Drug Delivery - Supplement for EquipmentR01GM049039 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI EDELMAN, ELAZER R · 1994 to 2019
$8.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM049039NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM 49039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStent thrombosis is a lethal complication of endovascular intervention. Concern has been raised about the inherent risk associated with specific stent designs and drug-eluting coatings, yet clinical and animal support is equivocal. METHODS AND

resultsWe examined whether drug-eluting coatings are inherently thrombogenic and if the response to these materials was determined to a greater degree by stent design and deployment with custom-built stents. Drug/polymer coatings uniformly reduce rather than increase thrombogenicity relative to matched bare metal counterparts (0.65-fold; P=0.011). Thick-strutted (162 μm) stents were 1.5-fold more thrombogenic than otherwise identical thin-strutted (81 μm) devices in ex vivo flow loops (P<0.001), commensurate with 1.6-fold greater thrombus coverage 3 days after implantation in porcine coronary arteries (P=0.004). When bare metal stents were deployed in malapposed or overlapping configurations, thrombogenicity increased compared with apposed, length-matched controls (1.58-fold, P=0.001; and 2.32-fold, P<0.001). The thrombogenicity of polymer-coated stents with thin struts was lowest in all configurations and remained insensitive to incomplete deployment. Computational modeling-based predictions of stent-induced flow derangements correlated with spatial distribution of formed clots.

conclusionsContrary to popular perception, drug/polymer coatings do not inherently increase acute stent clotting; they reduce thrombosis. However, strut dimensions and positioning relative to the vessel wall are critical factors in modulating stent thrombogenicity. Optimal stent geometries and surfaces, as demonstrated with thin stent struts, help reduce the potential for thrombosis despite complex stent configurations and variability in deployment.

Indexed as

AnimalsCattleDrug-Eluting StentsPolymersProsthesis DesignRisk FactorsSwineThrombosisTime FactorsPolymers

Identifiers

PMID21422389
PMCPMC3131199
OpenAlexW1595078900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.