Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21422297›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2011

Single-cell gene-expression profiling reveals qualitatively distinct CD8 T cells elicited by different gene-based vaccines.

Lukas Flatz, Rahul Roychoudhuri, Mitsuo Honda, Abdelali Filali-Mouhim, Jean-Philippe Goulet, Nadia Kettaf, Min Lin, Mario Roederer, Elias K Haddad, Rafick P Sékaly and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Systems-level analysis of innate immunity.Annual review of immunology · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Lukas FlatzVaccine Research Center, National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-3005, USA.
Rahul Roychoudhuri
Mitsuo Honda
Abdelali Filali-Mouhim
Jean-Philippe Goulet
Nadia Kettaf
Min Lin
Mario Roederer
Elias K Haddad
Rafick P Sékaly
Gary J Nabel
National Institutes of Health · USCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal · CANational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases · USUniversité de Montréal · CAVaccine and Gene Therapy Institute

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CD8 T cells play a key role in mediating protective immunity against selected pathogens after vaccination. Understanding the mechanism of this protection is dependent upon definition of the heterogeneity and complexity of cellular immune responses generated by different vaccines. Here, we identify previously unrecognized subsets of CD8 T cells based upon analysis of gene-expression patterns within single cells and show that they are differentially induced by different vaccines. Three prime-boost vector combinations encoding HIV Env stimulated antigen-specific CD8 T-cell populations of similar magnitude, phenotype, and functionality. Remarkably, however, analysis of single-cell gene-expression profiles enabled discrimination of a majority of central memory (CM) and effector memory (EM) CD8 T cells elicited by the three vaccines. Subsets of T cells could be defined based on their expression of Eomes, Cxcr3, and Ccr7, or Klrk1, Klrg1, and Ccr5 in CM and EM cells, respectively. Of CM cells elicited by DNA prime-recombinant adenoviral (rAd) boost vectors, 67% were Eomes(-) Ccr7(+) Cxcr3(-), in contrast to only 7% and 2% stimulated by rAd5-rAd5 or rAd-LCMV, respectively. Of EM cells elicited by DNA-rAd, 74% were Klrk1(-) Klrg1(-)Ccr5(-) compared with only 26% and 20% for rAd5-rAd5 or rAd5-LCMV. Definition by single-cell gene profiling of specific CM and EM CD8 T-cell subsets that are differentially induced by different gene-based vaccines will facilitate the design and evaluation of vaccines, as well as enable our understanding of mechanisms of protective immunity.

Indexed as

AIDS VaccinesAnimalsCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesFlow CytometryGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationLectins, C-TypeMiceMicroarray AnalysisNK Cell Lectin-Like Receptor Subfamily KReceptors, CCR7Receptors, CXCR3Receptors, ImmunologicReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionT-Box Domain ProteinsT-Lymphocyte SubsetsAIDS VaccinesCcr7 protein, mouseCxcr3 protein, mouseEomes protein, mouseKlrg1 protein, mouseKlrk1 protein, mouseLectins, C-TypeNK Cell Lectin-Like Receptor Subfamily KReceptors, CCR7Receptors, CXCR3Receptors, ImmunologicT-Box Domain Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21422297
PMCPMC3078363
OpenAlexW2017325329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.