Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21422107›Full record

SynthesisSchizophrenia bulletin2012

Pharmacological augmentation strategies for schizophrenia patients with insufficient response to clozapine: a quantitative literature review.

Iris E Sommer, Marieke J H Begemann, Anke Temmerman, Stefan Leucht

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02533232 (Minocycline Augmentation of Clozapine for Treatment Resistant Schizophrenia), which is not on this map. Cited by 36 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02533232 phase1unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Minocycline Augmentation of Clozapine for Treatment Resistant Schizophrenia: A Randomised Placebo-controlled Double-blind Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorPakistan Institute of Living and LearningRan2022 to 2022Enrolled60ConditionsSchizophrenia, Schizoaffective Disorder, Schizophreniform DisorderArmsMinocycline
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 157 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Antipsychotic combinations for schizophrenia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Valproate for schizophrenia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  4. Antipsychotic Polypharmacy and Corrected QT Interval: A Systematic Review.Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2015
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Prescribing patterns of long-acting injectable antipsychotics in a community setting in South Africa.The South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Clozapine augmentation strategies.The mental health clinician · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Iris E SommerNeuroscience Department of the University Medical Center Utrecht & Rudolf Magnus Institute for Neuroscience, Utrecht, The Netherlands. i.sommer@umcutrecht.nl
Marieke J H Begemann
Anke Temmerman
Stefan Leucht
Utrecht University · NLTechnical University of Munich · DEUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhen schizophrenia patients have insufficient response to clozapine, pharmacological augmentation is often applied. This meta-analysis summarizes available evidence on efficacy of pharmacological augmentation of clozapine treatment in schizophrenia spectrum disorder.

methodsOnly double-blind randomized controlled studies were included. Primary outcome measure was total symptom severity, and secondary outcome measures were subscores for positive and negative symptoms. Effect sizes were calculated from individual studies and combined to standardized mean differences (Hedges's g).

resultsTwenty-nine studies reporting on 15 different augmentations were included. Significant better efficacy than placebo on total symptom severity was observed for lamotrigine, citalopram, sulpiride, and CX516 (a glutamatergic agonist). The positive effect of lamotrigine disappeared after outlier removal. The other positive findings were based on single studies. Significantly better efficacy on positive symptom severity was observed for topiramate and sulpiride. The effect of topiramate disappeared after outlier removal. Results for sulpiride were based on a single randomized controlled trial. Citalopram, sulpiride, and CX516 showed better efficacy for negative symptoms than placebo, all based on single studies.

conclusionsEvidence for efficacy of clozapine augmentation is currently scarce. Efficacy of lamotrigine and topiramate were both dependent on single studies with deviating findings. The effect of citalopram, sulpiride, and CX516 were based on single studies. Thus, despite their popularity, pharmacological augmentations of clozapine are not (yet) demonstrated to be superior to placebo.

Indexed as

Schizophrenic PsychologyAntipsychotic AgentsBrief Psychiatric Rating ScaleCitalopramClozapineDioxolesDouble-Blind MethodDrug SynergismDrug Therapy, CombinationFructoseHumansLamotriginePiperidinesPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychotropic DrugsRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic1-(quinoxalin-6-ylcarbonyl)piperidineAntipsychotic AgentsCitalopramClozapineDioxolesFructoseLamotriginePiperidinesPsychotropic DrugsSulpirideTopiramateTriazines

Identifiers

PMID21422107
PMCPMC3446238
OpenAlexW2123069664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.