Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21421543›Full record

ArticleChemical senses2011

Citric acid and quinine share perceived chemosensory features making oral discrimination difficult in C57BL/6J mice.

Yada Treesukosol, Clare M Mathes, Alan C Spector

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical senses, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Variation in the geneAmerican journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2021
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yada TreesukosolDepartment of Psychology, Program in Neuroscience, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4301, USA.
Clare M Mathes
Alan C Spector
Florida State University · US

Funding

PSYCHOPHYSICAL EVALUATION OF TASTE FUNCTIONR01DC004574 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI SPECTOR, ALAN C · 2001 to 2019
$4.4M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004574NIDCD NIH HHS R01-DC004574
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence in the literature shows that in rodents, some taste-responsive neurons respond to both quinine and acid stimuli. Also, under certain circumstances, rodents display some degree of difficulty in discriminating quinine and acid stimuli. Here, C57BL/6J mice were trained and tested in a 2-response operant discrimination task. Mice had severe difficulty discriminating citric acid from quinine and 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) with performance slightly, but significantly, above chance. In contrast, mice were able to competently discriminate sucrose from citric acid, NaCl, quinine, and PROP. In another experiment, mice that were conditioned to avoid quinine by pairings with LiCl injections subsequently suppressed licking responses to quinine and citric acid but not to NaCl or sucrose in a brief-access test, relative to NaCl-injected control animals. However, mice that were conditioned to avoid citric acid did not display cross-generalization to quinine. These mice significantly suppressed licking only to citric acid, and to a much lesser extent NaCl, compared with controls. Collectively, the findings from these experiments suggest that in mice, citric acid and quinine share chemosensory features making discrimination difficult but are not perceptually identical.

Indexed as

AnimalsChemoreceptor CellsCitric AcidConditioning, PsychologicalMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLQuinineTasteCitric AcidQuinine

Identifiers

PMID21421543
PMCPMC3094691
OpenAlexW2100558232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.