Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21421084›Full record

ReviewActa biomaterialia2011

Bioactive glass in tissue engineering.

Mohamed N Rahaman, Delbert E Day, B Sonny Bal, Qiang Fu, Steven B Jung, Lynda F Bonewald, Antoni P Tomsia

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta biomaterialia, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 350 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
350citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
52.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

350 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1,717 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Material-Assisted Strategies for Osteochondral Defect Repair.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. iScience · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

290 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mohamed N RahamanDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409, USA. rahaman@mst.edu
Delbert E Day
B Sonny Bal
Qiang Fu
Steven B Jung
Lynda F Bonewald
Antoni P Tomsia
Missouri University of Science and Technology · USLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · USUniversity of Missouri · USUniversity of Missouri–Kansas City · US

Funding

Complex Nanocomposites for Bone RegenerationR01DE015633 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI TOMSIA, ANTONI P · 2003 to 2013
$9.2M
Periodontal Engineering by Growth Factor Release from Hollow HA MicrospheresR15DE018251 · NIDCR · MISSOURI UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY · PI RAHAMAN, MOHAMED N · 2008 to 2008
$226k
Novel Freeze-Cast Bioactive Glass Scaffolds for Bone RepairR15AR056119 · NIAMS · MISSOURI UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY · PI RAHAMAN, MOHAMED N · 2009 to 2009
$225k
NIAMS NIH HHS 1R15AR056119NIAMS NIH HHS R15 AR056119NIDCR NIH HHS 1R01DE015633NIDCR NIH HHS 1R15DE018251NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE015633NIDCR NIH HHS R15 DE018251
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review focuses on recent advances in the development and use of bioactive glass for tissue engineering applications. Despite its inherent brittleness, bioactive glass has several appealing characteristics as a scaffold material for bone tissue engineering. New bioactive glasses based on borate and borosilicate compositions have shown the ability to enhance new bone formation when compared to silicate bioactive glass. Borate-based bioactive glasses also have controllable degradation rates, so the degradation of the bioactive glass implant can be more closely matched to the rate of new bone formation. Bioactive glasses can be doped with trace quantities of elements such as Cu, Zn and Sr, which are known to be beneficial for healthy bone growth. In addition to the new bioactive glasses, recent advances in biomaterials processing have resulted in the creation of scaffold architectures with a range of mechanical properties suitable for the substitution of loaded as well as non-loaded bone. While bioactive glass has been extensively investigated for bone repair, there has been relatively little research on the application of bioactive glass to the repair of soft tissues. However, recent work has shown the ability of bioactive glass to promote angiogenesis, which is critical to numerous applications in tissue regeneration, such as neovascularization for bone regeneration and the healing of soft tissue wounds. Bioactive glass has also been shown to enhance neocartilage formation during in vitro culture of chondrocyte-seeded hydrogels, and to serve as a subchondral substrate for tissue-engineered osteochondral constructs. Methods used to manipulate the structure and performance of bioactive glass in these tissue engineering applications are analyzed.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsGlassTissue EngineeringBone RegenerationMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningBiocompatible Materials

Identifiers

PMID21421084
PMCPMC3085647
OpenAlexW2069523649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.