Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21419783›Full record

ReviewJournal of theoretical biology2012

Understanding microbial cooperation.

James A Damore, Jeff Gore

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of theoretical biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Breakdown of clonal cooperative architecture in multispecies biofilms and the spatial ecology of predation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Social evolution of shared biofilm matrix components.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  13. A Mutation Threshold for Cooperative Takeover.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  14. Modeling approaches for probing cross-feeding interactions in the human gut microbiome.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Kin selection explains the evolution of cooperation in the gut microbiota.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Understanding the evolution of interspecies interactions in microbial communities.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

James A DamoreDepartment of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA, United States.
Jeff Gore

Funding

Cooperation and conflict in microbial systems: sucrose metabolism in yeastR00GM085279 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI GORE, JEFF · 2010 to 2012
$742k
NIGMS NIH HHS R00 GM085279PHS HHS K99
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of microbial cooperation has grown enormously over the last decade, leading to improved experimental techniques and a growing awareness of collective behavior in microbes. Unfortunately, many of our theoretical tools and concepts for understanding cooperation fail to take into account the peculiarities of the microbial world, namely strong selection strengths, unique population structure, and non-linear dynamics. Worse yet, common verbal arguments are often far removed from the math involved, leading to confusion and mistakes. Here, we review the general mathematical forms of Price's equation, Hamilton's rule, and multilevel selection as they are applied to microbes and provide some intuition on these otherwise abstract formulas. However, these sometimes overly general equations can lack specificity and predictive power, ultimately forcing us to advocate for more direct modeling techniques.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionSelection, GeneticGame TheoryMicrobial InteractionsModels, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID21419783
PMCPMC3176967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.