Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21419156›Full record

ReviewProgress in biophysics and molecular biology2011

Evolving homeostatic tissue using genetic algorithms.

Philip Gerlee, David Basanta, Alexander R A Anderson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Progress in biophysics and molecular biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Homeostasis Back and Forth: An Ecoevolutionary Perspective of Cancer.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2017
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. A Systems Engineering Perspective on Homeostasis and Disease.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2013
    Review
  9. Systems biology and cancer.Progress in biophysics and molecular biology · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Philip GerleeCancer Centrum Sahlgrenska, Göteborg University, Sweden. gerlee@chalmers.se
David Basanta
Alexander R A Anderson

Funding

TrainingU54CA113007 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI ESTRADA-RODGERS, LOURDES · 2004 to 2014
$19.2M
NCI NIH HHS 5U54 CA113007NCI NIH HHS U54 CA113007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multicellular organisms maintain form and function through a multitude of homeostatic mechanisms. The details of these mechanisms are in many cases unknown, and so are their evolutionary origin and their link to development. In order to illuminate these issues we have investigated the evolution of structural homeostasis in the simplest of cases, a tissue formed by a mono-layer of cells. To this end, we made use of a 3-dimensional hybrid cellular automaton, an individual-based model in which the behaviour of each cell depends on its local environment. Using an evolutionary algorithm (EA) we evolved cell signalling networks, both with a fixed and an incremental fitness evaluation, which give rise to and maintain a mono-layer tissue structure. Analysis of the solutions provided by the EA shows that the two evaluation methods gives rise to different types of solutions to the problem of homeostasis. The fixed method leads to almost optimal solutions, where the tissue relies on a high rate of cell turnover, while the solutions from the incremental scheme behave in a more conservative manner, only dividing when necessary. In order to test the robustness of the solutions we subjected them to environmental stress, by wounding the tissue, and to genetic stress, by introducing mutations. The results show that the robustness very much depends on the mechanism responsible for maintaining homeostasis. The two evolved cell types analysed present contrasting mechanisms by which tissue homeostasis can be maintained. This compares well to different tissue types found in multicellular organisms. For example the epithelial cells lining the colon in humans are shed at a considerable rate, while in other tissue types, which are not as exposed, the conservative type of homeostatic mechanism is normally found. These results will hopefully shed light on how multicellular organisms have evolved homeostatic mechanisms and what might occur when these mechanisms fail, as in the case of cancer.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBiological EvolutionCell CommunicationCellular MicroenvironmentEvolution, MolecularHomeostasisHumansModels, BiologicalMorphogenesisMutationNeoplasmsSignal TransductionWounds and Injuries

Identifiers

PMID21419156
PMCPMC3812677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.