Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21417926›Full record

ArticleVector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.)2011

Environmental methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a veterinary teaching hospital during a nonoutbreak period.

Armando E Hoet, Amanda Johnson, Rocio C Nava-Hoet, Shane Bateman, Andrew Hillier, John Dyce, Wondwossen A Gebreyes, Thomas E Wittum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Methicillin-ResistantVeterinary sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Prevalence and anti-microbial resistance ofVeterinary research forum : an international quarterly journal · 2024
    Article
  7. Rapid typing ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  8. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  9. Antimicrobial resistance inVeterinary world · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Prevalence of methicillin-resistantThe Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2020
    Article
  13. Widespread Environmental Presence of Multidrug-ResistantFrontiers in veterinary science · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Environmental cleaning and disinfection.The Veterinary clinics of North America. Small animal practice · 2015
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Armando E HoetDepartment of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA. hoet.1@osu.edu
Amanda Johnson
Rocio C Nava-Hoet
Shane Bateman
Andrew Hillier
John Dyce
Wondwossen A Gebreyes
Thomas E Wittum
The Ohio State University · US

Funding

University of Iowa Clinical and Translational Science Program (TL1)UL1RR025755 · NCRR · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI JACKSON, REBECCA D · 2008 to 2011
$26.3M
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025755
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Concurrent to reports of zoonotic and nosocomial transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in veterinary settings, recent evidence indicates that the environment in veterinary hospitals may be a potential source of MRSA. The present report is a cross-sectional study to determine the prevalence of MRSA on specific human and animal contact surfaces at a large veterinary hospital during a nonoutbreak period. A total of 156 samples were collected using Swiffers(®) or premoistened swabs from the small animal, equine, and food animal sections. MRSA was isolated and identified by pre-enrichment culture and standard microbiology procedures, including growth on Mueller-Hinton agar supplemented with NaCl and oxacillin, and by detection of the mecA gene. Staphylococcal chromosome cassette mec (SCCmec) typing and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis profile were also determined. MRSA was detected in 12% (19/157) of the hospital environments sampled. The prevalence of MRSA in the small animal, equine, and food animal areas were 16%, 4%, and 0%, respectively. Sixteen of the MRSA isolates from the small animal section were classified as USA100, SCCmec type II, two of which had pulsed-field gel electrophoresis pattern that does not conform to any known type. The one isolate obtained from the equine section was classified as USA500, SCCmec type IV. The molecular epidemiological analysis revealed a very diverse population of MRSA isolates circulating in the hospital; however, in some instances, multiple locations/surfaces, not directly associated, had the same MRSA clone. No significant difference was observed between animal and human contact surfaces in regard to prevalence and type of isolates. Surfaces touched by multiple people (doors) and patients (carts) were frequently contaminated with MRSA. The results from this study indicate that MRSA is present in the environment even during nonoutbreak periods. This study also identified specific surfaces in a veterinary environment that need to be targeted when designing and executing infection control programs.

Indexed as

Environmental MicrobiologyHospitals, AnimalAnimalsCross-Sectional StudiesFomitesHumansMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusStudentsVeterinarians

Identifiers

PMID21417926
PMCPMC3391706
OpenAlexW1986595061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.