Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21417598›Full record

ReviewCritical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology2011

Defining the replication program through the chromatin landscape.

Queying Ding, David M MacAlpine

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. DNA replication origins.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2013
    Review
  17. Helicase loading at chromosomal origins of replication.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2013
    Review
  18. Mechanisms for initiating cellular DNA replication.Annual review of biochemistry · 2013
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Queying DingDepartment of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
David M MacAlpine
Duke Medical Center · USDuke University · US

Funding

The Systematic Identification and Analysis of Replication Origins in DrosophilaU01HG004279 · NHGRI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MACALPINE, DAVID M · 2007 to 2011
$2.6M
NHGRI NIH HHS HG004279NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG004279
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA replication is an essential cell cycle event required for the accurate and timely duplication of the chromosomes. It is essential that the genome is replicated accurately and completely within the confines of S-phase. Failure to completely copy the genome has the potential to result in catastrophic genomic instability. Replication initiates in a coordinated manner from multiple locations, termed origins of replication, distributed across each of the chromosomes. The selection of these origins of replication is a dynamic process responding to both developmental and tissue-specific signals. In this review, we explore the role of the local chromatin environment in regulating the DNA replication program at the level of origin selection and activation. Finally, there is increasing molecular evidence that the DNA replication program itself affects the chromatin landscape, suggesting that DNA replication is critical for both genetic and epigenetic inheritance.

Indexed as

Replication OriginAnimalsChromatinDNA ReplicationEpigenomicsGenomic InstabilityHumansNucleosomesS PhaseChromatinNucleosomes

Identifiers

PMID21417598
PMCPMC3074350
OpenAlexW2080839185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.