ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2011
Twenty years of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: where are we now?
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- vNOTES vs Minimally Invasive Colpopexy: National Study and Literature Review.International urogynecology journal · 2026Review
- Anatomical and functional outcomes after bilateral sacrospinous colposuspension (BSC) for the treatment of female genital prolapse.BMC urology · 2023Article
- Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension (LLS) for the Treatment of Apical Prolapse: A New Gold Standard?Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Prospective International Multicenter Pelvic Floor Study: Short-Term Follow-Up and Clinical Findings for Combined Pectopexy and Native Tissue Repair.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Intraocular pressure change during laparoscopic sacral colpopexy in patients with normal tension glaucoma.International urogynecology journal · 2019Article
- [Old wine in new bottles-proven open-surgical procedures for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2019Review
- Article
- Laparoscopic trans teres vault suspension, a new laparoscopic method of treatment of female genital prolapse - a preliminary report.Przeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review · 2016Article
- Laparoscopic Suturing as a Barrier to Broader Adoption of Laparoscopic Surgery.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisLaparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) was first described almost 20 years ago. This technique aims to provide the outcomes of the gold standard abdominal approach while offering the benefits of minimally invasive surgery. However, the widespread diffusion of LSC in the management of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is hampered by its presumed length and technical difficulties due to the inherent need for laparoscopic suturing skills.
methodsIn this article, we highlight the current status of LSC based on a historical overview and in the paradigm of an interrelationship between the three different approaches to POP correction.
resultsThe enormous changes over the past 15 years have contributed to a better understanding of the pathologies and their treatment, which has enabled us to refine LSC, to simplify it, and to make it much more reproducible.
conclusionsIn the future, we will need more prospective studies to compare LSC with vaginal reconstructive surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.