Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21416331›Full record

ArticleCurrent treatment options in neurology2011

Behçet's Disease.

Gulsen Akman-Demir, Sabahattin Saip, Aksel Siva

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current treatment options in neurology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Behçet's Syndrome and Nervous System Involvement.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2018
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Behçet's syndrome: providing integrated care.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2017
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Behçet's Disease and Nervous System Involvement.Current treatment options in neurology · 2016
    Review
  13. Neuro-Behcet's: a diagnostic challenge.Oxford medical case reports · 2015
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Kleptomania in patients with neuro-Behçet's disease.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2013
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gulsen Akman-DemirCerrahpasa School of Medicine, Department of Neurology, Istanbul University, Cerrahpasa, 34093, Istanbul, Turkey.
Sabahattin Saip
Aksel Siva
Istanbul University · TRIstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementNeurologic involvement in Behçet's disease (BD) is seen in about 5% to 10% of all BD patients. Clinical and imaging data suggest that neurologic involvement in BD presents in two major forms. The first, central nervous system (CNS) parenchymal involvement with a predilection to brainstem-diencephalic regions, is seen in the majority of patients with neuro-BD (NBD). The second form is cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST), which is seen in up to 20% of cases. BD is very rare in children, but when it does occur, the patterns are reversed: most children with NBD present with CVST. Other syndromes such as spinal cord involvement, arterial CNS involvement, optic neuritis, aseptic meningitis, and peripheral neuropathies may be seen, but are rare. Venous sinus thrombosis in BD has a significantly better neurologic prognosis than parenchymal CNS involvement. There is no Class I evidence regarding treatment of parenchymal CNS involvement or CVST in BD. Current treatment applications are based largely on expert opinion; none are evidence-based. Acute parenchymal CNS involvement should be treated with high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP), 1 g per day, for 5 to 10 days, followed by either a prolonged oral taper or intermittent IVMP pulses with a low oral dose between the pulses, over 6 months. After treatment of the acute attack, long-term maintenance with immunosuppressive agents should be considered in patients with parenchymal CNS involvement, as this form may follow a relapsing or secondary progressive course and may result in significant physical and cognitive deficits leading to severe neurologic disability. A number of randomized controlled studies have tested treatments for systemic manifestations of BD. Colchicine was found to be effective for mucocutaneous symptoms, thalidomide was found to be effective in erythema nodosum-like skin lesions, azathioprine and cyclosporine were shown to be effective in BD uveitis, and cyclophosphamide was shown to be effective for major vascular involvement. More recently, interferon alfa and anti-TNF agents were also shown to be effective in BD uveitis. Although randomized controlled studies have not been performed in NBD, the most widely used long-term therapeutic agent is azathioprine. Recent observations suggest that the addition and long-term use of azathioprine in NBD could be associated with a more favorable course. A growing number of case reports in recent years suggest that anti-TNF agents may be an effective alternative in NBD, but current experience with these agents is limited. CVST in BD is also treated with steroids. The addition to glucocorticoids of anticoagulation, including short-term fractionated heparin, is controversial, as these patients have a higher probability of harboring pulmonary or other aneurysms, which may be associated with an increased risk of bleeding. Long-term oral anticoagulation is unnecessary. Interestingly, the prognosis of CVST due to BD seems to be much more favorable than the prognosis of CVST due to other causes, with much less tendency for venous infarcts and seizures. However, as recurrences may occur, long-term treatment with azathioprine is recommended.

Identifiers

PMID21416331
OpenAlexW4245659763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.