ReviewLangenbeck's archives of surgery2011
Tolerance in clinical transplantation: progress, challenge or just a dream?
Review in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Role of steroid minimization in the tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen for liver transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials.Hepatology international · 2014Review
- T-regulatory cell-mediated immune tolerance as a potential immunotherapeutic strategy to facilitate graft survival.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2013Review
- Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery supporting the 128th annual meeting of the German Society of Surgery in Munich, 3-6 May 2011. "Heilen zwischen Ratio und Humanität".Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe achievement of clinical operational tolerance (COT) is still considered a major goal in the academic field of solid organ transplantation. Even COT is feasible and safe in selected cases after liver transplantation, in the clinical arena of solid organ transplantation, tolerance remains, for the most part, a concept rather than a reality. CHALLENGES: Although modern immunosuppression regimens have effectively handled acute rejection, nearly all organs except the liver commonly suffer chronic immunologic damage that impairs organ function, threatening patient and allograft survival. Strong arguments in favour of conducting clinical tolerance trials are the high number of grafts still lost due to chronic rejection, the burden of serious adverse effects from immunosuppressants which causes considerable cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, respectively, and the fact that sporadic tolerance can be observed in rare cases where non-adherence to immunosuppressive regimens is linked with a state of long-lasting organ tolerance. Whereas molecule-based regimens have been largely ineffective, cell-based tolerance protocols have delivered some encouraging results to achieve COT. DISCUSSION: In combination with donor bone marrow-derived stem cells, some encouraging results in COT development were reported lately for renal transplantation as well. However, less toxic conditioning protocols and more experience by use of cell products with regulatory properties in combination with synergizing immunosuppressive drugs is required to launch future tolerance trials for a broader spectrum of potential transplant candidates. New methods in immunomonitoring including biomarkers, microarray-based genetic tolerance signatures and functional assays may pave the way to achieve COT in upcoming clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.