Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21416056›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2011

Proteomic identification of biomarkers of vascular injury.

Ngan F Huang, Kyle Kurpinski, Qizhi Fang, Randall J Lee, Song Li

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of translational research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. A new SOFrontiers in physiology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ngan F Huang
Kyle Kurpinski
Qizhi Fang
Randall J Lee
Song Li

Funding

Tissue Engineered Nanofibrous Vascular GraftR01HL083900 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI LI, SONG · 2006 to 2010
$2.0M
Proteomic Profiling of Stem Cell DifferentiationR21HL079419 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI LI, SONG · 2004 to 2005
$353k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL083900NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL079419
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predictive biomarkers may be beneficial for detecting, diagnosing, and assessing the risk of restenosis and vascular injury. We utilized proteomic profiling to identify protein markers in the blood following vascular injury, and corroborated the differential protein expression with immunological approaches. Rats underwent carotid artery injury, and plasma was collected after 2 or 5 weeks. Proteomic profiling was carried out by two-dimensional differential in-gel electrophoresis. The differentially expressed plasma proteins were identified by mass spectroscopy and confirmed by immunoblotting. Proteomic profiling by two-dimensional differential in-gel electrophoresis and mass spectroscopy revealed plasma proteins that were differentially expressed at 2 weeks after injury. Among the proteins identified included vitamin D binding protein (VDBP), aldolase A (aldo A), and apolipoproteinE (apoE). Immunoblotting results validated a significant reduction in these proteins in the plasma at 2 or 5 weeks after vascular injury, in comparison to control animals without vascular injury. These findings suggest that VDBP, aldo A, and apoE may be biomarkers for vascular injury, which will have important prognostic and diagnostic implications.

Indexed as

aldolaseangioplastyapolipoprotein Eatherosclerosisplasma markerproteomic profilingVascular injuryvitamin D binding protein

Identifiers

PMID21416056
PMCPMC3056560
OpenAlexW1568250109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.