Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21416030›Full record

ArticleAfrican health sciences2010

Genetic diversity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Mbarara, South Western Uganda.

J Bazira, M Matte, B B Asiimwe, L M Joloba

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in African health sciences, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Diversity ofTuberculosis research and treatment · 2021
    Article
  2. Exploring the usefulness of molecular epidemiology of tuberculosis in Africa: a systematic review.International journal of molecular epidemiology and genetics · 2020
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

J BaziraDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda. jap2k2001@yahoo.co.uk
M Matte
B B Asiimwe
L M Joloba

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe determined the genetic diversity of mycobacteria isolated from tuberculosis patients in Mbarara Uganda, using region of difference (RD) analysis and spacer oligonucleotide typing (spoligotyping).

methodsSputum samples were cultured on Lowenstein Jensen media. The isolates were characterized using RD analysis and spoligotyping.

resultsThe majority (92.8%) of the patients were new cases, 60% were males and 44% were HIV positive with a mean age of 33.7 years. All the 125 isolates were identified as M.tuberculosis sensu stricto. Most (92.8%) of the isolates were modern strains. Spoligotyping revealed 79 spoligotype patterns, with an overall diversity of 63.2%. Sixty (48%) isolates formed 16 clusters each consisting of 2-15 isolates. Mst (59.2 %) of the isolates were Uganda genotype strains. The major shared spoligotypes in our sample were SIT 135 (T2-Uganda) with 12 isolates and SIT 128 (T2) with 5 isolates. Sixty nine (87%) patterns had not yet been defined in the SpolDB4.0.database.

conclusionThe TB epidemic in Mbarara is caused mainly by modern M.tuberculosis strains of the Uganda genotype. The wide diversity of strains may indicate that the majority of the TB cases are reactivation rather than re-infection. However this needs to be ascertained with more discriminative finger printing techniques.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationAdultBacterial Typing TechniquesCross-Sectional StudiesDNA, BacterialFemaleGenotypeHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMycobacterium tuberculosisOligonucleotidesPolymerase Chain ReactionPrevalenceRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidDNA, BacterialOligonucleotidesMycobacteriaRegion of differencespoligotypes

Identifiers

PMID21416030
PMCPMC3052804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.