ReviewBiotechnology & genetic engineering reviews2010
Targeted deep resequencing of the human cancer genome using next-generation technologies.
Review in Biotechnology & genetic engineering reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- A robust targeted sequencing approach for low input and variable quality DNA from clinical samples.NPJ genomic medicine · 2018Article
- The context of prostate cancer genomics in personalized medicine.Oncology letters · 2017Article
- Mutation profiling of 19 candidate genes in acute myeloid leukemia suggests significance of DNMT3A mutations.Oncotarget · 2016Article
- Targeted next-generation sequencing effectively analyzed the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene in pancreatitis.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2015Article
- A programmable method for massively parallel targeted sequencing.Nucleic acids research · 2014Article
- Accurate detection of subclonal single nucleotide variants in whole genome amplified and pooled cancer samples using HaloPlex target enrichment.BMC genomics · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Next-generation sequencing technologies have revolutionized our ability to identify genetic variants, either germline or somatic point mutations, that occur in cancer. Parallelization and miniaturization of DNA sequencing enables massive data throughput and for the first time, large-scale, nucleotide resolution views of cancer genomes can be achieved. Systematic, large-scale sequencing surveys have revealed that the genetic spectrum of mutations in cancers appears to be highly complex with numerous low frequency bystander somatic variations, and a limited number of common, frequently mutated genes. Large sample sizes and deeper resequencing are much needed in resolving clinical and biological relevance of the mutations as well as in detecting somatic variants in heterogeneous samples and cancer cell sub-populations. However, even with the next-generation sequencing technologies, the overwhelming size of the human genome and need for very high fold coverage represents a major challenge for up-scaling cancer genome sequencing projects. Assays to target, capture, enrich or partition disease-specific regions of the genome offer immediate solutions for reducing the complexity of the sequencing libraries. Integration of targeted DNA capture assays and next-generation deep resequencing improves the ability to identify clinically and biologically relevant mutations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.