ReviewCurrent opinion in pediatrics2011
The intestinal microbiome of infants and the use of probiotics.
Review in Current opinion in pediatrics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of probiotic on anxiety and depression symptoms in pregnant and lactating women and microbiota of infants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of global health · 2023Pooled it
- The effects of probiotics supplementation on metabolic health in pregnant women: An evidence based meta-analysis.PloS one · 2018Pooled it
- Inhibitory Effect ofDrug design, development and therapy · 2021Article
- Implications of Probiotics on the Maternal-Neonatal Interface: Gut Microbiota, Immunomodulation, and Autoimmunity.Frontiers in immunology · 2018Review
- Aggressive Nutrition of the Preterm Infant.Current pediatrics reports · 2013Article
- Robustness of gut microbiota of healthy adults in response to probiotic intervention revealed by high-throughput pyrosequencing.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2013Article
- Proteomics as a Quality Control Tool of Pharmaceutical Probiotic Bacterial Lysate Products.PloS one · 2013Article
- Short term outcomes after extreme preterm birth in England: comparison of two birth cohorts in 1995 and 2006 (the EPICure studies).BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2012Article
- Integrated Role ofmSystemsArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewThe increasing use of probiotics in neonates deserves scrutiny of the therapeutic as well as potentially harmful effects of these bacteria. In this review we describe the possible application of probiotics in the more common diseases in the neonatal period. RECENT
findingsRecent advances in our capability to identify microbes and their function in the gastrointestinal tract offer exciting opportunities to discover the pathophysiology of enigmatic diseases such as necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and late-onset sepsis (LOS) in the neonate. The relationship of the resident intestinal microbes to neural and muscular processes such as intestinal motility and neurodevelopment are also being evaluated. SUMMARY: We focus on the possibility of the application of probiotics for disorders of motility in the infant, NEC and LOS. Here we will summarize some of the recent advances in these areas as they relate to clinical practice and discuss areas where additional research is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.