Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21415126›Full record

ReviewPharmacological reviews2011

Human disease models in Drosophila melanogaster and the role of the fly in therapeutic drug discovery.

Udai Bhan Pandey, Charles D Nichols

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacological reviews, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 476 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
476citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

476 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Optimization and Metabolomic Profiling ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  5. A Landscape ofBiology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Biology · 2026
    Review
  10. Special Issue "International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

416 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Udai Bhan PandeyDepartment of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, 1901 Perdido St., New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
Charles D Nichols

Funding

Combining mammalian and Drosophila systems to study neuropsychiatric disordersR01MH083689 · NIMH · LSU HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER · PI NICHOLS, CHARLES D · 2009 to 2012
$1.4M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH083689NIMH NIH HHS R01-MH083689
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The common fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, is a well studied and highly tractable genetic model organism for understanding molecular mechanisms of human diseases. Many basic biological, physiological, and neurological properties are conserved between mammals and D. melanogaster, and nearly 75% of human disease-causing genes are believed to have a functional homolog in the fly. In the discovery process for therapeutics, traditional approaches employ high-throughput screening for small molecules that is based primarily on in vitro cell culture, enzymatic assays, or receptor binding assays. The majority of positive hits identified through these types of in vitro screens, unfortunately, are found to be ineffective and/or toxic in subsequent validation experiments in whole-animal models. New tools and platforms are needed in the discovery arena to overcome these limitations. The incorporation of D. melanogaster into the therapeutic discovery process holds tremendous promise for an enhanced rate of discovery of higher quality leads. D. melanogaster models of human diseases provide several unique features such as powerful genetics, highly conserved disease pathways, and very low comparative costs. The fly can effectively be used for low- to high-throughput drug screens as well as in target discovery. Here, we review the basic biology of the fly and discuss models of human diseases and opportunities for therapeutic discovery for central nervous system disorders, inflammatory disorders, cardiovascular disease, cancer, and diabetes. We also provide information and resources for those interested in pursuing fly models of human disease, as well as those interested in using D. melanogaster in the drug discovery process.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterDrug Delivery SystemsDrug DesignDrug DiscoveryHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID21415126
PMCPMC3082451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.