Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21414483›Full record

ReviewCell2011

Cellular decision making and biological noise: from microbes to mammals.

Gábor Balázsi, Alexander van Oudenaarden, James J Collins

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 516 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
516citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

516 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Exploring bet-hedging inmSystems · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Continual decision-making dynamics across biological organisms.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

456 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gábor BalázsiDepartment of Systems Biology-Unit 950, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 7435 Fannin Street, Houston, TX 77054, USA.
Alexander van Oudenaarden
James J Collins

Funding

TRANS-NETWORK PROJECTSU54CA143874 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI VAN OUDENAARDEN, ALEXANDER · 2009 to 2013
$15.1M
A Network Biology Approach to Antibiotic Action and Bacterial Defense MechanismsDP1OD003644 · OD · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI COLLINS, JAMES J · 2007 to 2011
$4.1M
Comparative phenotypic, functional, and molecular analysis of ESC and iPSCRC2HL102815 · NHLBI · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI CHURCH, GEORGE M, COLLINS, JAMES J · 2009 to 2010
$3.4M
Stochastic gene expression in differentiation and developmentDP1OD003936 · OD · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI VAN OUDENAARDEN, ALEXANDER · 2008 to 2011
$3.4M
SysCODE: Tooth Germ Design and Engineering (2 of 10)RL1DE019021 · NIDCR · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI MAAS, RICHARD L · 2007 to 2011
$2.8M
Connecting the selection of noisy gene expression deviants to genetic evolutionDP2OD006481 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI BALAZSI, GABOR · 2009 to 2009
$2.3M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNCI NIH HHS U54 CA143874NCI NIH HHS U54CA143874NHLBI NIH HHS RC2 HL102815NIDCR NIH HHS RL1 DE019021NIH HHS 1DP1OD003936NIH HHS 1DP2 OD006481-01NIH HHS DP1 OD00344NIH HHS DP1 OD003644NIH HHS DP1 OD003936NIH HHS DP2 OD006481
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellular decision making is the process whereby cells assume different, functionally important and heritable fates without an associated genetic or environmental difference. Such stochastic cell fate decisions generate nongenetic cellular diversity, which may be critical for metazoan development as well as optimized microbial resource utilization and survival in a fluctuating, frequently stressful environment. Here, we review several examples of cellular decision making from viruses, bacteria, yeast, lower metazoans, and mammals, highlighting the role of regulatory network structure and molecular noise. We propose that cellular decision making is one of at least three key processes underlying development at various scales of biological organization.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationModels, BiologicalAnimalsHumans

Identifiers

PMID21414483
PMCPMC3068611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.