Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21412914›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2011

Gabapentin for chronic neuropathic pain and fibromyalgia in adults.

R Andrew Moore, Philip J Wiffen, Sheena Derry, Henry J McQuay

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05603702 (STTEPP), which is not on this map. Cited by 122 papers, 46 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
122citing papers in PubMed, 46 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05603702 phase1active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

STTEPP: Safety, Tolerability and Dose Limiting Toxicity of Lacosamide in Patients With Painful Chronic Pancreatitis

TypeinterventionalSponsorIndiana UniversityRan2023 to 2027Enrolled21ConditionsChronic Pain, Chronic Pain Syndrome, Chronic Pancreatitis, HyperalgesiaArmsLacosamide
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

122 citing papers in PubMed, 46 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 690 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Topical clonidine for neuropathic pain in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Acupuncture for neuropathic pain in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Tramadol for neuropathic pain in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  7. Gabapentin for chronic neuropathic pain in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  8. Morphine for chronic neuropathic pain in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  9. Oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for fibromyalgia in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Gabapentin for fibromyalgia pain in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  13. Fentanyl for neuropathic pain in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  14. Oxycodone for neuropathic pain in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  15. Cannabinoids for fibromyalgia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  16. Antipsychotics for fibromyalgia in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  17. Hydromorphone for neuropathic pain in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  18. Buprenorphine for neuropathic pain in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  19. Topical clonidine for neuropathic pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  20. Milnacipran for neuropathic pain in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it

62 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

R Andrew MoorePain Research and Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (Nuffield Division of Anaesthetics), University of Oxford, Pain Research Unit, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK, OX3 7LJ.
Philip J Wiffen
Sheena Derry
Henry J McQuay
University of Oxford · GBCochrane · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis review updates parts of two earlier Cochrane reviews investigating effects of gabapentin in chronic neuropathic pain (pain due to nerve damage). Antiepileptic drugs are used to manage pain, predominantly for chronic neuropathic pain, especially when the pain is lancinating or burning.

objectivesTo evaluate the analgesic effectiveness and adverse effects of gabapentin for chronic neuropathic pain management. SEARCH STRATEGY: We identified randomised trials of gabapentin in acute, chronic or cancer pain from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL. We obtained clinical trial reports and synopses of published and unpublished studies from Internet sources. The date of the most recent search was January 2011. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised, double-blind studies reporting the analgesic and adverse effects of gabapentin in neuropathic pain with assessment of pain intensity and/or pain relief, using validated scales. Participants were adults aged 18 and over. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted data. We calculated numbers needed to treat to benefit (NNTs), concentrating on IMMPACT (Initiative on Methods, Measurement and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials) definitions of at least moderate and substantial benefit, and to harm (NNH) for adverse effects and withdrawal. Meta-analysis was undertaken using a fixed-effect model. MAIN

resultsTwenty-nine studies (3571 participants), studied gabapentin at daily doses of 1200 mg or more in 12 chronic pain conditions; 78% of participants were in studies of postherpetic neuralgia, painful diabetic neuropathy or mixed neuropathic pain. Using the IMMPACT definition of at least moderate benefit, gabapentin was superior to placebo in 14 studies with 2831 participants, 43% improving with gabapentin and 26% with placebo; the NNT was 5.8 (4.8 to 7.2). Using the IMMPACT definition of substantial benefit, gabapentin was superior to placebo in 13 studies with 2627 participants, 31% improving with gabapentin and 17% with placebo; the NNT was 6.8 (5.6 to 8.7). These estimates of efficacy are more conservative than those reported in a previous review. Data from few studies and participants were available for other painful conditions.Adverse events occurred significantly more often with gabapentin. Persons taking gabapentin can expect to have at least one adverse event (66%), withdraw because of an adverse event (12%), suffer dizziness (21%), somnolence (16%), peripheral oedema (8%), and gait disturbance (9%). Serious adverse events (4%) were no more common than with placebo.There were insufficient data for comparisons with other active treatments. AUTHORS'

conclusionsGabapentin provides pain relief of a high level in about a third of people who take if for painful neuropathic pain. Adverse events are frequent, but mostly tolerable. More conservative estimates of efficacy resulted from using better definitions of efficacy outcome at higher, clinically important, levels, combined with a considerable increase in the numbers of studies and participants available for analysis.

Indexed as

AminesAnalgesicsChronic DiseaseCyclohexanecarboxylic AcidsFibromyalgiaGabapentingamma-Aminobutyric AcidHumansNeuralgiaRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAminesAnalgesicsCyclohexanecarboxylic AcidsGabapentingamma-Aminobutyric Acid

Identifiers

PMID21412914
PMCPMC4171034
OpenAlexW1943094646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.