ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2011
The Bio-PIN: a concept to improve biobanking.
Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cancer metastasis chemoprevention prevents circulating tumour cells from germination.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2022Review
- Genomic cloud computing: legal and ethical points to consider.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2015Article
- Epigenome data release: a participant-centered approach to privacy protection.Genome biology · 2015Article
- DataSHIELD: taking the analysis to the data, not the data to the analysis.International journal of epidemiology · 2014Article
- The International Cancer Genome Consortium's evolving data-protection policies.Nature biotechnology · 2014Article
- Standardization developments for large scale biobanks in smoking related diseases - a model system for blood sample processing and storage.Translational respiratory medicine · 2013Article
- Biobanking, consent, and certificates of confidentiality: does the ANPRM muddy the water?The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2013Article
- Questioning the limits of genomic privacy.American journal of human genetics · 2012Article
- The BIO-PIN paradigm: 'access to' or 'return of' results?Nature reviews. Cancer · 2011Article
- Biobanking residual tissues.Human genetics · 2011Review
- Bio-PIN could cut biobanking risks.Nature · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A new biobanking method is proposed, wherein samples and associated data would be deposited anonymously and labelled using a PIN code that is produced on the basis of personal biological characteristics, such as single nucleotide polymorphisms. The code would be the 'Bio-PIN' to uniquely distinguish the sample depositors, plus their samples and data. This method could help to diminish several long-discussed ethical, legal and societal problems in biobanking regarding privacy, informed consent, autonomy, data security and public trust.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21412253What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.