Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21411368›Full record

ReviewTrends in immunology2011

Mutiny or scrutiny: NK cell modulation of DC function in HIV-1 infection.

Galit Alter, Marcus Altfeld

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in immunology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Distribution of immune cells in the human cervix and implications for HIV transmission.American journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y. : 1989) · 2014
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Human-specific evolution of killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor recognition of major histocompatibility complex class I molecules.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2012
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Galit AlterRagon Institute of MGH, MIT, and Harvard, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA 02120, USA.
Marcus Altfeld
Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT and Harvard · US

Funding

Recognition of HIV-1 by Innate Immunity Receptors during Primary InfectionP01AI074415 · NIAID · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI ALLEN, TODD M · 2008 to 2013
$17.3M
NK cell mediated immune pressure in HIV-1 infectionR01AI067031 · NIAID · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI ALTFELD, MARCUS · 2006 to 2015
$4.4M
NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI074415NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI067031
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accumulating data suggest that natural killer (NK) cells are involved not only in the innate antiviral response following infection, but also in shaping the quality of the adaptive immune response by modulating the functional properties of myeloid dendritic cells (DC) during the acute immune response to infection. In this role, NK cells ensure that only fully mature, immunogenic DCs gain access to inductive sites, where they might prime effective antiviral adaptive immune responses. However, increasing evidence now suggests that several aspects of this cross-talk between NK cells and DCs are compromised during HIV infection, potentially contributing to immune dysfunction.

Indexed as

Adaptive ImmunityCell CommunicationDendritic CellsHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansImmunity, InnateKiller Cells, Natural

Identifiers

PMID21411368
PMCPMC3090508
OpenAlexW2155232617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.