Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21410648›Full record

ArticleInternational wound journal2011

Treatment of the open abdomen with topical negative pressure therapy: a retrospective study of 46 cases.

Aleidis Caro, Carles Olona, Andrea Jiménez, Jordi Vadillo, Francesc Feliu, Vicente Vicente

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International wound journal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. The role of open abdomen in non-trauma patient: WSES Consensus Paper.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2017
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Comparative study of open abdomen treatment: ABThera™ vs. abdominal dressing™.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2015
    Article
  18. The open abdomen, indications, management and definitive closure.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2015
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aleidis CaroGeneral Digestive Surgery Department, University Hospital Joan XXIII de Tarragona, Rovira i Virgili University, 43007 Tarragona, Spain. dra5028@gmail.com
Carles Olona
Andrea Jiménez
Jordi Vadillo
Francesc Feliu
Vicente Vicente
Hospital Universitari Joan XXIII de Tarragona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The open abdomen is an ongoing challenge for professionals engaged in its treatment. The change in the integrity of the abdominal wall, the loss of fluids, heat and proteins and contamination of the wound are the main problems. The objective of this article is to describe our experience using the abdominal dressing vacuum-assisted closure therapy in treatment of the open abdomen. Since December 2006, all patients requiring treatment with the open abdomen technique have been treated with the abdominal dressing system and vacuum-assisted closure therapy (VAC(®) KCI, San Antonio, USA). The results obtained with this technique in non traumatic patients are analysed herein. The abdominal dressing system was used on 46 patients in the period between January 2006 and December 2009, with a mean 63 years old (29-80), with a gender distribution of 33 men (72%) and 13 women (28%). Closure of the abdominal wall was possible in 24 patients, 5 of which were primary in the recent postoperative phase, 5 had primary suture of the fascia and application of the supra-aponeurotic prosthesis and 14 had closure of the abdominal wall with a composite polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and polypropylene mesh. Second intention closure took place in the remaining 22 patients (48%), as their conditions did not allow primary closure. The mean treatment time with abdominal dressing was 26 days (6-92) with an average of eight changes per patient. The abdominal dressing topical negative pressure system is a useful option for consideration in the event of needing to leaves the abdomen open. It stabilises the abdominal wall and quantifies and collects exudate from the wound, protects the intra-abdominal viscera and keeps the fascia intact and the cutaneous plane for subsequent closure of the wall.

Indexed as

Abdominal WallAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNegative-Pressure Wound TherapyRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentSeverity of Illness IndexSurgical Wound DehiscenceTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID21410648
PMCPMC7950746
OpenAlexW1982611171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.