ReviewThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2011
Dedicated bifurcation analysis: dedicated devices.
Review in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- BiOSS® Clinical Programme - State of the Art - BiOSS LIM® Stent - The Novel Option for Coronary Bifurcation Treatment.Interventional cardiology (London, England) · 2015Review
- Cardiovascular imaging 2011 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2012Review
- QCA, IVUS and OCT in interventional cardiology in 2011.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Percutaneous treatment of bifurcations with conventional (straight) stents has been associated with complex procedures and poor clinical outcomes. Also, several limitations including side branch ostial gap, excessive metal density in the parent vessel, incomplete stent apposition, and stent distortion/disruption have been reported with current techniques. Dedicated bifurcation stents have been designed to simplify the procedure, even in complex and challenging anatomies, and to improve acute and late outcomes. The application of conventional quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) analysis, originally designed for straight vessel analysis, in the bifurcation anatomy has resulted in inconsistent results. Also, the lack of standardized QCA method for reporting has precluded the possibility for accurate comparison between clinical trials and different techniques and devices. We review QCA results of dedicated bifurcation devices reported according new dedicated QCA segmental analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.