Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21408615›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

The global risk approach should be better applied in French hypertensive patients: a comparison between simulation and observation studies.

Ivanny Marchant, Patrice Nony, Michel Cucherat, Jean-Pierre Boissel, S Randall Thomas, Theodora Bejan-Angoulvant, Alexandra Laugerotte, Riad Kahoul, François Gueyffier

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pharmacotherapy for mild hypertension.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pharmacotherapy for mild hypertension.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Bridging Systems Medicine and Patient Needs.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2015
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ivanny MarchantDepartamento de Pre-clínicas, Escuela de Medicina, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile. ivanny.marchant@uv.cl
Patrice Nony
Michel Cucherat
Jean-Pierre Boissel
S Randall Thomas
Theodora Bejan-Angoulvant
Alexandra Laugerotte
Riad Kahoul
François Gueyffier

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prediction of the public health impact of a preventive strategy provides valuable support for decision-making. International guidelines for hypertension management have introduced the level of absolute cardiovascular risk in the definition of the treatment target population. The public health impact of implementing such a recommendation has not been measured. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsWe assessed the efficiency of three treatment scenarios according to historical and current versions of practice guidelines on a Realistic Virtual Population representative of the French population aged from 35 to 64 years: 1) BP≥160/95 mm Hg; 2) BP≥140/90 mm Hg and 3) BP≥140/90 mm Hg plus increased CVD risk. We compared the eligibility following the ESC guidelines with the recently observed proportion of treated amongst hypertensive individuals reported by the Etude Nationale Nutrition Santé survey. Lowering the threshold to define hypertension multiplied by 2.5 the number of eligible individuals. Applying the cardiovascular risk rule reduced this number significantly: less than 1/4 of hypertensive women under 55 years and less than 1/3 of hypertensive men below 45 years of age. This was the most efficient strategy. Compared to the simulated guidelines application, men of all ages were undertreated (between 32 and 60%), as were women over 55 years (70%). By contrast, younger women were over-treated (over 200%).

conclusionThe global CVD risk approach to decide for treatment is more efficient than the simple blood pressure level. However, lack of screening rather than guideline application seems to explain the low prescription rates among hypertensive individuals in France. Multidimensional analyses required to obtain these results are possible only through databases at the individual level: realistic virtual populations should become the gold standard for assessing the impact of public health policies at the national level.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationInternationalityAdultAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureDrug PrescriptionsFemaleFranceHealth Plan ImplementationHealth Planning GuidelinesHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceRisk FactorsAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID21408615
PMCPMC3048301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.