ArticlePloS one2011
Assessing the biological significance of gene expression signatures and co-expression modules by studying their network properties.
Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- DNA Repair and Immune Response Pathways Are Deregulated in Melanocyte-Keratinocyte Co-cultures Derived From the Healthy Skin of Familial Melanoma Patients.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
- OncoBinder facilitates interpretation of proteomic interaction data by capturing coactivation pairs in cancer.Oncotarget · 2016Article
- Screening for the optimal gene and functional gene sets related to breast cancer using differential co-expression and differential expression analysis.Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers · 2016Article
- Quantitative assessment of gene expression network module-validation methods.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- Network analysis of gene expression in peripheral blood identifies mTOR and NF-κB pathways involved in antipsychotic-induced extrapyramidal symptoms.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2015Article
- DECODE: an integrated differential co-expression and differential expression analysis of gene expression data.BMC bioinformatics · 2015Article
- The role of the interactome in the maintenance of deleterious variability in human populations.Molecular systems biology · 2014Article
- A generally applicable translational strategy identifies S100A4 as a candidate gene in allergy.Science translational medicine · 2014Article
- Pathway network inference from gene expression data.BMC systems biology · 2014Article
- Pathways systematically associated to Hirschsprung's disease.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2013Article
- Four new loci associations discovered by pathway-based and network analyses of the genome-wide variability profile of Hirschsprung's disease.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2012Article
- Discovering the hidden sub-network component in a ranked list of genes or proteins derived from genomic experiments.Nucleic acids research · 2012Article
- Highly interconnected genes in disease-specific networks are enriched for disease-associated polymorphisms.Genome biology · 2012Article
- Evaluation of gene association methods for coexpression network construction and biological knowledge discovery.PloS one · 2012Article
- Weighted frequent gene co-expression network mining to identify genes involved in genome stability.PLoS computational biology · 2012Article
- Cliques for the identification of gene signatures for colorectal cancer across population.BMC systems biology · 2012Article
- Tools for protein-protein interaction network analysis in cancer research.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microarray experiments have been extensively used to define signatures, which are sets of genes that can be considered markers of experimental conditions (typically diseases). Paradoxically, in spite of the apparent functional role that might be attributed to such gene sets, signatures do not seem to be reproducible across experiments. Given the close relationship between function and protein interaction, network properties can be used to study to what extent signatures are composed of genes whose resulting proteins show a considerable level of interaction (and consequently a putative common functional role).We have analysed 618 signatures and 507 modules of co-expression in cancer looking for significant values of four main protein-protein interaction (PPI) network parameters: connection degree, cluster coefficient, betweenness and number of components. A total of 3904 gene ontology (GO) modules, 146 KEGG pathways, and 263 Biocarta pathways have been used as functional modules of reference.Co-expression modules found in microarray experiments display a high level of connectivity, similar to the one shown by conventional modules based on functional definitions (GO, KEGG and Biocarta). A general observation for all the classes studied is that the networks formed by the modules improve their topological parameters when an external protein is allowed to be introduced within the paths (up to the 70% of GO modules show network parameters beyond the random expectation). This fact suggests that functional definitions are incomplete and some genes might still be missing. Conversely, signatures are clearly not capturing the altered functions in the corresponding studies. This is probably because the way in which the genes have been selected in the signatures is too conservative. These results suggest that gene selection methods which take into account relationships among genes should be superior to methods that assume independence among genes outside their functional contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.