Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21408137›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

An AFM-based stiffness clamp for dynamic control of rigidity.

Kevin D Webster, Ailey Crow, Daniel A Fletcher

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cell response to substrate rigidity is regulated by active and passive cytoskeletal stress.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Tapping out a mechanical code for T cell triggering.The Journal of cell biology · 2016
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Cells as liquid motors: mechanosensitivity emerges from collective dynamics of actomyosin cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A time-dependent phenomenological model for cell mechano-sensing.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2014
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A hitchhiker's guide to mechanobiology.Developmental cell · 2011
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kevin D WebsterBiophysics Graduate Group, University of California, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Ailey Crow
Daniel A Fletcher
University of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

TRANS-NETWORK PROJECTSU54CA143836 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI LIPHARDT, JAN T. · 2009 to 2014
$15.1M
Differential Force MicroscopyR01GM072736 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI FLETCHER, DANIEL A · 2005 to 2009
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS 1U54CA143836-01NCI NIH HHS U54 CA143836NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM072736
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atomic force microscopy (AFM) has become a powerful tool for measuring material properties in biology and imposing mechanical boundary conditions on samples from single molecules to cells and tissues. Constant force or constant height can be maintained in an AFM experiment through feedback control of cantilever deflection, known respectively as a 'force clamp' or 'position clamp'. However, stiffness, the third variable in the Hookean relation F = kx that describes AFM cantilever deflection, has not been dynamically controllable in the same way. Here we present and demonstrate a 'stiffness clamp' that can vary the apparent stiffness of an AFM cantilever. This method, employable on any AFM system by modifying feedback control of the cantilever, allows rapid and reversible tuning of the stiffness exposed to the sample in a way that can decouple the role of stiffness from force and deformation. We demonstrated the AFM stiffness clamp on two different samples: a contracting fibroblast cell and an expanding polyacrylamide hydrogel. We found that the fibroblast, a cell type that secretes and organizes the extracellular matrix, exhibited a rapid, sub-second change in traction rate (dF/dt) and contraction velocity (dx/dt) in response to step changes in stiffness between 1-100 nN/µm. This response was independent of the absolute contractile force and cell height, demonstrating that cells can react directly to changes in stiffness alone. In contrast, the hydrogel used in our experiment maintained a constant expansion velocity (dx/dt) over this range of stiffness, while the traction rate (dF/dt) changed with stiffness, showing that passive materials can also behave differently in different stiffness environments. The AFM stiffness clamp presented here, which is applicable to mechanical measurements on both biological and non-biological samples, may be used to investigate cellular mechanotransduction under a wide range of controlled mechanical boundary conditions.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaCell MovementFeedback, PhysiologicalFibroblastsHydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol DimethacrylateMiceMicroscopy, Atomic ForceNIH 3T3 CellsHydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol Dimethacrylate

Identifiers

PMID21408137
PMCPMC3050926
OpenAlexW2005438069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.