Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21408123›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2011

Analysis of antibody and cytokine markers for leprosy nerve damage and reactions in the INFIR cohort in India.

Rupendra Jadhav, Lavanya Suneetha, Ravindra Kamble, Vidyagouri Shinde, Karuna Devi, Meher Vani Chaduvula, Renuka Raju, Sujai Suneetha, Peter G Nicholls, Wim H van Brakel and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Rupendra JadhavStanley Brown Laboratories, The Leprosy Mission, Shahdara, New Delhi, India. rupenjadhav@yahoo.com
Lavanya Suneetha
Ravindra Kamble
Vidyagouri Shinde
Karuna Devi
Meher Vani Chaduvula
Renuka Raju
Sujai Suneetha
Peter G Nicholls
Wim H van Brakel
Diana N J Lockwood
Lepra Society · INLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBRoyal Tropical Institute · NLTLM Shahdara Hospital · INUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

Leprosy Research Support-Post Genome -26625469N01AI025469 · NIAID · Colorado State University · 2004 to 2004
–
NIAID NIH HHS N01 AI025469
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ILEP Nerve Function Impairment in Reaction (INFIR) is a cohort study designed to identify predictors of reactions and nerve function impairment (NFI) in leprosy. AIM OF THE STUDY: Antibodies to mycobacteria, nerve components and serum cytokine were measured as potential markers for their possible association with reactions and NFI. PATIENTS AND

methods303 newly diagnosed leprosy patients from two centres in North India were enrolled. Antibodies to PGL-1, LAM (IgG1 and IgG3), ceramide, S100 and TNFα levels were measured using ELISA techniques.

resultsS-100, PGL IgG and IgM antibody levels were lowest in patients with BT leprosy and highest in patients with lepromatous leprosy. LAM IgG1 and LAM IgG3 antibody levels were highest in patients with BL leprosy. Ceramide antibody levels were not correlated with type of leprosy. Levels of all the antibodies tested and TNF α were lowest in patients with only skin reaction. PGL IgM antibody levels were elevated in patients with skin reactions and NFI. Old sensory NFI is associated with significant elevation of PGL IgG, LAM IgG and S100 antibody levels.

conclusionThese results reveal that the antibody response to mycobacterial antigens, nerve antigens and cytokines are in a dynamic flux and could collectively contribute to NFI in leprosy. The association of multiple markers with old NFI may indicate the contribution of different pathological processes.

Indexed as

Antibodies, BacterialAutoantibodiesBiomarkersCohort StudiesCytokinesEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHumansImmunoglobulin GIndiaLeprosyPeripheral Nervous System DiseasesAntibodies, BacterialAutoantibodiesBiomarkersCytokinesImmunoglobulin G

Identifiers

PMID21408123
PMCPMC3050910
OpenAlexW2162446333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.