Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21407244›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2011

Unravelling the effects of the environment and host genotype on the gut microbiome.

Aymé Spor, Omry Koren, Ruth Ley

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 745 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
745citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

745 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

685 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aymé SporDepartment of Microbiology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA.
Omry Koren
Ruth Ley

Funding

A Quality Assurance, Coordination and Analysis Center for HMPU01HG004866 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI WHITE, OWEN R · 2008 to 2012
$12.5M
NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG004866
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To what extent do host genetics control the composition of the gut microbiome? Studies comparing the gut microbiota in human twins and across inbred mouse lines have yielded inconsistent answers to this question. However, candidate gene approaches, in which one gene is deleted or added to a model host organism, show that a single host gene can have a tremendous effect on the diversity and population structure of the gut microbiota. Now, quantitative genetics is emerging as a highly promising approach that can be used to better understand the overall architecture of host genetic influence on the microbiota, and to discover additional host genes controlling microbial diversity in the gut. In this Review, we describe how host genetics and the environment shape the microbiota, and how these three factors may interact in the context of chronic disease.

Indexed as

GenesAdaptive ImmunityAnimalsDietEnvironmentGastrointestinal TractGenotypeHumansImmunity, InnateMetagenomeMiceMice, Inbred StrainsMicrobial ConsortiaTwins

Identifiers

PMID21407244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.