Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21406993›Full record

ReviewJournal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)2010

Progress in HIV reduction and prevention among injection and noninjection drug users.

Natalie D Crawford, David Vlahov

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Community Impact of Pharmacy-Randomized Intervention to Improve Access to Syringes and Services for Injection Drug Users.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2014
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Exchange Sex and HIV Infection Among Women Who Inject Drugs-20 US Cities, 2009.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Natalie D CrawfordDepartment of Epidemiology, Center for Urban Epidemiologic Studies, New York Academy of Medicine, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY 10029, USA.
David Vlahov

Funding

NATURAL HISTORY OF HIV INFECTION IN INJECTION DRUG USERSR37DA004334 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KIRK, GREGORY D · 1997 to 2006
$9.0M
THE NATURAL HISTORY OF HIV INFECTION AMONG DRUG USERSR01DA004334 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KIRK, GREGORY D · 1987 to 2011
$7.6M
HEPATITIS C IN NEW IDUS: IMPLICATIONS FOR HIV PREVENTIONR01DA013146 · NIDA · NEW YORK ACADEMY OF MEDICINE · PI GALEA, SANDRO · 2000 to 2004
$3.8M
Natural History of HIV Infection In Injection Drug UsersR56DA004334 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KIRK, GREGORY D · 2012 to 2013
$3.2M
Heroin Cessation and Hiv Risk: A Case-Control StudyR01DA022123 · NIDA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI OMPAD, DANIELLE C · 2007 to 2011
$3.2M
Pharmacy Referral Intervention: IDU Access to ServicesR01DA022144 · NIDA · NEW YORK ACADEMY OF MEDICINE · PI LEWIS, CRYSTAL FULLER · 2007 to 2010
$2.8M
PREVENTION OF HIV AMONG NEW IDUS AND NON-IDUS IN HARLEMR01DA012801 · NIDA · NEW YORK ACADEMY OF MEDICINE · PI FULLER, CRYSTAL M · 2000 to 2004
$2.3M
Social Predictors for Transition into Injection Drug UseR01DA019964 · NIDA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI LEWIS, CRYSTAL FULLER · 2005 to 2009
$2.2M
Development of Behavioral and Social Interventions that Reduce Stigma and ImproveRC1DA028284 · NIDA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI LEWIS, CRYSTAL FULLER · 2009 to 2010
$1000k
NIDA NIH HHS DA019964NIDA NIH HHS DA022123NIDA NIH HHS DA022144NIDA NIH HHS DA04334NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA004334NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA012801NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA013146NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA019964NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA022123NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA022144NIDA NIH HHS R37 DA004334NIDA NIH HHS R56 DA004334NIDA NIH HHS RC1DA028284
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Substantial progress has been made in reducing HIV among injection drug users (IDUs) in the United States, despite political and social resistance that reduced resources and restricted access to services. The record for HIV prevention among noninjecting drug users is less developed, although they are more numerous than IDUs. Newer treatments for opiate and alcohol abuse can now be integrated into primary HIV care; treatment for stimulant abuse is less developed. All drug users present challenges for newer HIV prevention strategies (eg, "test and treat," nonoccupational postexposure prophylaxis and preexposure prophylaxis, contingency management, and conditional cash transfer). A comprehensive HIV prevention program that includes multicomponent multilevel approaches (ie, individual, network, structural) has been effective in HIV prevention among IDUs. Expanding these approaches to noninjecting drug users, especially those at highest risk (eg, minority men who have sex with men) and incorporating these newer approaches is a public health priority.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsHumansSubstance-Related DisordersUnited States

Identifiers

PMID21406993
PMCPMC3298118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.